File:Arkhipova.jpg: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 09:50, 14 July 2007 editMER-C (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators250,751 edits Image is missing fair use rationale and will be deleted in seven days if it is not added.← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:01, 14 July 2007 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,657 edits Biruitorul's opinion from talk page of User:Butseriouslyfolks Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{di-no fair use rationale\|date=July 14 2007}}
	] in 1966.		] in 1966.

	Source: http://www.cultinfo.ru/fulltext/1/001/008/050/699.htm		Source: http://www.cultinfo.ru/fulltext/1/001/008/050/699.htm

			{{Non-free fair use in\|Irina Arkhipova}}

			I think the key here is to be reasonable. Madame Arkhipova is 83 and retired. She looks nothing like she did in her prime -- and remember, the work that really made her notable had all taken place by, let us say, the late 1980s.
	{{Non-free promotional}}
			Which takes us to the Misplaced Pages policy guideline -- guideline -- that disallows fair use for "An image of a living person that merely shows what s/he looks like. The rationale is that this is potentially replaceable with a freshly produced free photograph."
			Now, that's a perfectly sensible position with which I have no problem in many cases. However, there are exceptions. We do need fair-use images for ]: I doubt he'd allow you or me the chance to snap a picture. We have a couple of free images of ] that he was kind enough to provide himself, but given that he basically has no jaw now, I think users would be better served by fair use images of the earlier Ebert, if we didn't have the current images. With Arkhipova, again: do users want to see a little old lady in who knows what condition, or are they better served by seeing a radiant soloist in her prime? On balance, and considering all the issues involved, I think the rationale is solid enough.

Revision as of 10:01, 14 July 2007

Irina Arkhipova in 1966.

Source: http://www.cultinfo.ru/fulltext/1/001/008/050/699.htm

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content § Images or Misplaced Pages:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Misplaced Pages non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work:

To illustrate the subject in question
Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information
On the English-language Misplaced Pages, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Misplaced Pages or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.
Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/File:Arkhipova.jpg

true

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Misplaced Pages:Use rationale examples.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.
This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Fair usetrue

I think the key here is to be reasonable. Madame Arkhipova is 83 and retired. She looks nothing like she did in her prime -- and remember, the work that really made her notable had all taken place by, let us say, the late 1980s. Which takes us to the Misplaced Pages policy guideline -- guideline -- that disallows fair use for "An image of a living person that merely shows what s/he looks like. The rationale is that this is potentially replaceable with a freshly produced free photograph." Now, that's a perfectly sensible position with which I have no problem in many cases. However, there are exceptions. We do need fair-use images for Kim Jong Il: I doubt he'd allow you or me the chance to snap a picture. We have a couple of free images of Roger Ebert that he was kind enough to provide himself, but given that he basically has no jaw now, I think users would be better served by fair use images of the earlier Ebert, if we didn't have the current images. With Arkhipova, again: do users want to see a little old lady in who knows what condition, or are they better served by seeing a radiant soloist in her prime? On balance, and considering all the issues involved, I think the rationale is solid enough.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

	Date/Time	Thumbnail	Dimensions	User	Comment
current	11:49, 19 July 2006		149 × 200 (5 KB)	Ghirlandajo (talk \| contribs)	Irina Arkhipova in 1966. {{sovietPD}} Source: http://www.cultinfo.ru/fulltext/1/001/008/050/699.htm

You cannot overwrite this file.

File usage

The following page uses this file:

Irina Arkhipova

Metadata

This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it.

If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.

_error	0

Category:

Misplaced Pages non-free images