| Revision as of 06:44, 17 July 2007 editGATXER (talk | contribs)106 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:45, 17 July 2007 edit undoGATXER (talk | contribs)106 editsm wanted on blocked info till block over then will revertNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <sup>]</sup> 15:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION == | |||
| Good afternoon, I'm writing to let you know that apart from the complaints made against you on the 3RR noticeboard, there is a complaint that has been made against you at the ] with claims that you have been uncivil. Please note that this type of conduct is generally frowned upon here at Misplaced Pages. To get a better idea of what constitutes civil and uncivil comments, I suggest you familiarise yourself with various readings found ]. Referring to other users a "moonbats" or "idiots" will only damage your reputation on this website and if this activity persists, could get you ]. The removal of sourced content without consensus and referring to it as "POV vandalism" is unacceptable as well. Because you seem to feel strongly about the subjects you choose to edit in, I would suggest you take some time to read the ] to get a better sense of how to make edits which comply with policy. | |||
| <p>I would like to hear your opinion on this, in hopes that we can come to a resolve. Please visit the ] to voice any type of defence you may have. Thank you, and have a nice day.] ] ]]''' 22:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikietiquette Case == | |||
| GATXER, I am writing to let you know that I appreciated your willingness to cooperate with my advice regarding Misplaced Pages civility policy. You may not be aware of this, but this is a major step to becoming more respected as an editor, and in time, you will see that having a reputation of being temparate gets you far in terms of how seriously other editors will take your words.<span style="font-family:Vivaldi; background-color:#FFFFFF;">]<sub> ]</sub></span> 16:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked for 48 hours== | ==Blocked for 48 hours== | ||
Revision as of 06:45, 17 July 2007
Welcome!
Blocked for 48 hours
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Jersey Devil 21:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Template:No edit war existed sloppy Admin work.
What edit war??? I just changed it back to how it was before Editor N made a change? I cant understand why you Admin let Editor N bully people to get his way....how many mediaations does he get before the Admin get clue and stop him? BTW: I doubt you blocked editor N even thought he made more changes then I did....but hey why do the right thing now. Frankly Misplaced Pages is really starting to suck....and it rep is going down for a reason. Editor N wants his POV on Bush pages. Anyone looking at his edits could see that...if they bothered to look before doing things....the guy called Bush the Fhurer for god sake......do he sound like someon who should even be editiong Bush pages??? If he does.....maybe what people say about Wkik is true after all. How many more people is Editor N going to bully right off Wki before the Admins do their jobs a stop it? My guess based on this bogas block....is no time soon!GATXER 06:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)