Revision as of 20:21, 2 June 2005 editHabap (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,731 edits Explanation of the "SG Sucks" and reference to those pages← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:22, 2 June 2005 edit undoHabap (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,731 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"SG sucks." posted by 65.49.152.201 after I removed a rude comment he'd made on ] -- ''I know! How about we put it in "Clans with Elitist Stuck-Up Assholes As Leaders"!'' -- as it added nothing of value to the discussion. He's entitled to his opinion (note that his edit of the main page ] was not changed, pending investigation). I am uncertain of what personal conflict the user has with Spoon, but would prefer that we remain encyclopedic, rather than emotional about this issue. | "SG sucks." posted by ] after I removed a rude comment he'd made on ] -- ''I know! How about we put it in "Clans with Elitist Stuck-Up Assholes As Leaders"!'' -- as it added nothing of value to the discussion. He's entitled to his opinion (note that his edit of the main page ] was not changed, pending investigation). I am uncertain of what personal conflict the user has with Spoon, but would prefer that we remain encyclopedic, rather than emotional about this issue. |
Revision as of 20:22, 2 June 2005
"SG sucks." posted by User:65.49.152.201 after I removed a rude comment he'd made on Talk:Sturmgrenadier -- I know! How about we put it in "Clans with Elitist Stuck-Up Assholes As Leaders"! -- as it added nothing of value to the discussion. He's entitled to his opinion (note that his edit of the main page Sturmgrenadier was not changed, pending investigation). I am uncertain of what personal conflict the user has with Spoon, but would prefer that we remain encyclopedic, rather than emotional about this issue.