Revision as of 01:34, 24 July 2007 editViridae (talk | contribs)13,898 edits →[]: cm← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:42, 24 July 2007 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,078 edits →[]: remove thread using Troll-B-Gon Professional 1.0Next edit → | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
Guy, please stop wheel warring over that redirect. Please. Please. ] (]) 19:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | Guy, please stop wheel warring over that redirect. Please. Please. ] (]) 19:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
* Interesting comment. Violetriga undeleted it (wheel-warring) when the cited arbcom case found that Violetriga does not properly understand ]. I hope you have asked Violetriga to stop wheel warring as well... <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 23:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | * Interesting comment. Violetriga undeleted it (wheel-warring) when the cited arbcom case found that Violetriga does not properly understand ]. I hope you have asked Violetriga to stop wheel warring as well... <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 23:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
Please don't make an AfD nomination into a personal attack. Yes, there are people that create bad articles for fun, and just the fact that such a person created a given article could be a reason to look at an article more closely. But those people are indefinitely banned trolls. Please don't treat a fellow administrator like that. --] <sup>]</sup> 21:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Seconded. Not only, further, did your nomination untowardly and unhelpfully focus on contributor rather than content, but, of course, it also, one need not to say, misstated rather significantly the observations of the ArbCom relative to Violet. I might expect that from someone who, as I, is a critic of our present BLP policy and an advocate for its being narrowly applied, but I'd imagine that someone who is greatly concerned (perhaps rightly) that we ensure that any sources we adduce actually go toward the propositions that we support with them and that we not misrepresent the whole of a person might be a bit more careful when referring to another individual, even a pseudonymous contributor. I really must, in truth, ask what you hoped to accomplish by mentioning Violet in your AfD nom. You are, to be sure, known as someone who is sometimes abrupt and in his terseness unintentionally offensive, and I, as you, have never seen anything significantly wrong with that, but here it seems you went out of your way to make reference to an editor in good standing, and I can't imagine why you thought that would prove constructive; if you wanted to suggest that the interpretation of policy rendered by the ArbCom in the BDJ case was on point here and counseled deletion (which, IMHO, it plainly doesn't), you might have done so without mentioning the tangentially involved Violet, no? ] 22:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
* It wasn't, it was a statement of fact. Violetriga did not, at that time, properly understand the ramifications of recent clarifications of policy. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 23:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
**That has absolutely no bearing on the validity of the article or whether it should be kept or deleted at afd. That comment was extremly out of line. Perhaps you should have considered your position at wikipedia more fully before returning as your recent behaviour includes multiple examples of behaviour that is entirely unbefitting of an administrator.. ]] 01:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:42, 24 July 2007
Misplaced Pages ads | file info – show another – #62 |
Guy is away, somewhat disillusioned. He will be back. Probably. |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:JzG/Archive-Jan-2025. Some may be manually archived earlier than that, if no further action is required or productive debate is at an end. |
Guy Chapman? He's just zis Guy, you know? More about me
If you need urgent admin help please go to the incident noticeboard. To stop a vandal, try the vandal intervention page. For general help why not try the help desk? If you need me personally and it's urgent you may email me, I read all messages even if I do not reply. If next time I log on is soon enough, click this link to start a new conversation.
Terms of Service
By posting on this page you accept the JzG Terms of Service. I endeavour to satisfy good-faith requests to the best of my ability, but if you act like a dick, I will call you a dick. If you act like a troll, I will probably ignore you and may tell you to fuck off. If you want something from me, your best bet is not to demand it on pain of shopping me to ArbCom, because that way is pretty much guaranteed to piss me off to the extent that I will do whatever I can to thwart your plans. This page may contain trolling. Some of it might even be from me, but never assume trolling where a misplaced sense of humour might explain things. I can be provoked, it's not even terribly difficult. You may find, if you provoke me enough, that I will do something I later regret. Only remember, you may regret it more. I am a middle-aged surly bastard who spends his working day wrestling spammers and beating Windows with a stick, but I am capable of seeing good in the most improbable people if they don't go out of their way to make me do otherwise. Guy (Help!) 22:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
This user posts using a British sense of humour and does not repress those instantaneous motions of merriment.
Meow
You're not seriously leaving us, are you? Please stick around! Think of all the kittens... >Radiant< 12:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I am really not convinced I want to be a part of a project which gives any response other than "get lost" to blatant trolls like Rfwoolf. It's not even as if he is a clever troll, since he called my userpage quote a "revenge post" or some such - can there really be any tolerably-educated adult in the US or UK who would fail to recognise that quote? Will no-one rid me of this turbulent troll? Guy (Help!) 22:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- You have my absolute word that I never once called your userpage a "revenge post" or any somesuch. At all. You have my word. Now I am not here to refuel fire or troll or any some such, I now take my part. Rfwoolf 01:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- You forgot your pound of flesh! MastCell 03:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well... shit. :o(-Wafulz 20:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
This needs to be solved
I have taken the "List of Companies" problem (what to do with an entire class of articles that get repeatedly submitted for deletion en mass?) for debate to two different places. This really needs to be solved once and for all (we can't keep debating the same stuff for eternity). Would you take a look at either the discussion on the Village Pump or the relevant wikiproject? Aditya Kabir 15:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Mfd
A previous nomination of yours has been renominated. - Crockspot 19:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Speedy or AfD this if necessary, thanks.
Donkey Rollers (Give me about five more years and I'll figure out how to tag things--I have successfully tagged a couple of attack articles.) KP Botany 04:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- thanks. KP Botany 04:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
St. Francis Xavier's College (Liverpool)
Can I kindly request my being able to edit this article again. I'm not a vandal, the previous issue has been resolved in my opinion, and I would like to continue editing - in the first instance by adding an Infobox, for example. I'm a member of the Education Wikiproject and will avoid any of the content that earlier caused that difference of opinion. Thanks in anticipation. Liverpool Scouse 18:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Wheel warring
Guy, please stop wheel warring over that redirect. Please. Please. MessedRocker (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Interesting comment. Violetriga undeleted it (wheel-warring) when the cited arbcom case found that Violetriga does not properly understand WP:BP. I hope you have asked Violetriga to stop wheel warring as well... Guy (Help!) 23:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)