| Revision as of 16:47, 5 June 2005 editHalibutt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,067 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:48, 5 June 2005 edit undoChris 73 (talk | contribs)25,597 edits ::Also see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#Halibutt. -- ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :BTW, you might want to question this interpretation at ] ]] 16:47, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) | :BTW, you might want to question this interpretation at ] ]] 16:47, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::Also see ]. -- ] ] 16:48, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:48, 5 June 2005
I'm fascinated to learn that the Polish for Mainz is Moguncja, but does it have much to do with this article, or indeed with the distinctly Rheinland, nowhere-near-Poland-whatsoever, character of the city? And how does the Gdansk vote affect this at all? Alai 16:28, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The Gdansk vote says specifically, that the cross-naming affects any place that has a shared Polish-German history. In this case, there has been a large Polish diaspora there in the 19th century, also there were Polish troops stationed there during the Napoleonic Wars. The city was German, the troops were Polish - so the history is shared.
- BTW, you might want to question this interpretation at Talk:Gdansk/Vote/discussion Halibutt 16:47, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Also see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#Halibutt. -- Chris 73 Talk 16:48, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)