Misplaced Pages

User talk:InkSplotch: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:24, 30 July 2007 editInkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits Tidying up← Previous edit Revision as of 17:02, 2 August 2007 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits Wikimedia Foundation WP:3RRNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== ] ] ==

{{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Wikimedia Foundation|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> I have no comment on who is correct at this time, but I see no evidence you've been warned. You may also be authorized to "violate" ] under the overriding ]. &mdash; ] | ] 17:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:02, 2 August 2007

Wikimedia Foundation WP:3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikimedia Foundation. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. I have no comment on who is correct at this time, but I see no evidence you've been warned. You may also be authorized to "violate" WP:3RR under the overriding WP:BLP. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)