Misplaced Pages

User talk:Irishguy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:19, 4 August 2007 editIrishguy (talk | contribs)45,851 edits Please explain why do you removed my page considering embedded linux PC?: comment← Previous edit Revision as of 00:30, 4 August 2007 edit undo71.232.176.63 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 135: Line 135:


:The ] was a blatant advertisment. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a venue for advertisement. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 00:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC) :The ] was a blatant advertisment. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a venue for advertisement. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 00:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


oh yeah, like I am going to deal with this ass now.

later

Revision as of 00:30, 4 August 2007

Please leave a new message.
Archiving icon
Archives
*/Archive 1: July, 2005 – June, 2006
*/Archive 2: June 2-3, 2006
*/Archive 3: June 3-20, 2006
*/Archive 4: June 30 – July 18, 2006
*/Archive 5: July 19 - September 8, 2006
*/Archive 6: September 9 - October 5, 2006
*/Archive 7: October 7 - November 26, 2006
*/Archive 8: November 27, 2006 - February 12, 2007
*/Archive 9: February 13, 2007 - March 3, 2007
*/Archive 10: March 3, 2007 - March 11, 2007
*/Archive 11: March 11, 2007 - April 1, 2007
*/Archive 12: April 1, 2007 - April 9, 2007
*/Archive 13: April 9, 2007 - April 28, 2007
*/Archive 14: April 29, 2007 - May 14, 2007
*/Archive 15: May 15, 2007 - May 23, 2007
*/Archive 16: May 23, 2007 - June 15, 2007
*/Archive 17: June 15, 2007 - July 8, 2007
*/Archive 18: July 8, 2007 - August 2, 2007

Feel free to leave comments at the bottom of the page.


It should go without saying that trolling, vandalism, and personal attacks will be promptly removed. Thanks. IrishGuy

Thanks

Thanks for taking care of this guy. He was beginning to tire me out. :P -- Gravitan 00:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all. :) IrishGuy 00:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Please Help

You recently blocked my user name JungleEdgeStill. I received no warning. I saw a page that said I was supposed to email you. I could not find your email. What should I do. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.213.187 (talkcontribs)

You received a warning by having every other harrassing sock blocked. Find somewhere else to play. Enough. IrishGuy 01:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Question

Hi- We are co-producing the inaugural New York Photo Festival in 2008 with the VII Photo Agency (http://en.wikipedia.org/VII_Photo_Agency), yet you and another individual keep deleting our Wiki entry of who we are; we have eliminated all promotional mentions of ourselves, and the facts included in our entry are documented; many of our contemporaries in independent book publishing have similar listings, including Distributed Art Publishers (http://en.wikipedia.org/Distributed_art_publishers), a company I cofounded in 1990, so I am wondering what gives.

Thanks, Daniel PowerDaniellpower 01:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I assume you are talking about PowerHouse Books and PowerHouse Arena. Both were blatant advertisements written by people with a conflict of interest. Misplaced Pages is not a venue for you to advertise your company. IrishGuy 01:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

my edits reverted ("multiple links to the same website"?)

Totally nonsense and you are only drawing the attention away. Vatical.va and NewAdvant.org and thousands of others on wikipedia are also "multiple links to the same website" just because most of the systemized websites on this planet unquestionably do have links to their motherpage/homepage, with hyperlink name like "Back" or "Back To Homepage" or "Home". And you really call that spam? By the way your new self-styled definition ("multiple links to the same website") does not match the official wiki definition of spamming.

And you are the one who make false accusation. Read the wiki's definition you posted yourself "Adding the same link to many articles". Same link in simple english means identical link, different pages with link to one mother homepage(including Yahoo.com, YouTube.com, Vatican.va, NewAdvent.org, ....etc) do not count.

What I've done have nothing to do with Misplaced Pages's official definition of spamming. I hereby recover all my edits.

Stop making excuses. Go back to the wikipedia official def. of spamming. - 219.73.11.127 03:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, by "same link" it means "same website". You were spamming. Don't do it again. IrishGuy 03:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

no, those are different links with different URLs, as I posted it already as proof. With different contents and different articles, are you saying "Mary's Viginity", "Bible as sufficient", "Purgatory", "Papal Infallability" are identical?

Are <Music.Yahoo.com> and <Finance.yahoo.com> "one link"? I am not sure how many more excuses you want to make.

You read the pages YOURSELF and undo what you have falsely done! - 219.73.11.127 03:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

You were bulk adding links to CARM.org. That is spamming. IrishGuy 03:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)


NO, those are different pages and different URLs, only the domain names are the same: CARM-DOT-ORG.

First of all, I did not post </CARM.ORG/>. What I added are different web articles on different HTML pages written by CARM apologist. By your self-styled definition why didn't you remove those thousand of vatican.va/blarblarblar.html then? It's hypocrtical! See what I showed you as proof (in Archive 18). Those are DIFFERENT ARTICLES!!!! READ THE ARTICLES YOURSELF!!

Secondly, see Wiki's definition of spamming: "Same link to many articles". It's Link ! Not Site ! A single site usually comes with many links. Yahoo.com, cnn.com, fox.com (etc.) are sites comprising millions of links. <music.yahoo.com> and <finance.yahoo.com> are hardly the "same link"

Thirdly, I notice that on my own talk page you falsely accused me of adding "inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages". I hereby insist that what I added are fully on-topic per wikipedia's rules. For example

"inappropriate"? 219.73.11.127 03:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Again, read WP:SPAM. You were adding links to the same website in multiple articles without actually adding any content. You were spamming. The next time you post here, it will be deleted. I am tired of your harassment. IrishGuy 07:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Tell me which verse on WP:SPAM I have violated then! It is you who quote the exact wiki definition of spam "Same Link to many articles". And you fail to prove that what I have added are one single link.

Few hours ago I have referred this case, as a complain, to another administrator and request for advise/mediation.

And don't try to threaten me like this "The next time you post here, it will be deleted. I am tired of your harassment".

You only told me to read this "WP:" and read that "WP:" but FAILED to prove what exact guideline I have violated. Feel free to delete my comment, but it would only show that you have no credibility at all.

It is not harrassment, it is about the quality of your administratorship.

Like it or not, instances long exist on wikipedia when CARM articles are widely used as external/supporting sources:

It means the wikipedia community does't classify CARM articles as Spam. (and of course you all along show us no evidence of spamming). Time for you POV pusher to hand off. Have a nice day.--219.73.11.127 08:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

You are deliberately twisting words. I never said that CARM was a bad site. I said the mass additions of links to the same website is spamming...and it is. You were even blocked today for spamming. Stop. IrishGuy 20:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review note - Fan Wars (2008 film)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fan Wars (2008 film). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Bryan Seecrets 09:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry.

I wasn't trying to ignore wikipedia's guidelines, but I'm not very sure how to comply to it. Sometimes the guidelines seem vague and unclear to me. And if there is anything I can do to have my article on wikipedia, please tell me. I'm very very sorry, and I didn't know I could be banned for doing this. Antimatter15 14:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Antimatter15 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Why did you

get rehind of the gamers site wiki? its a good site i found why did you do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardboiled1234 (talkcontribs)

It was an advertisement for a completely non-notable website. IrishGuy 23:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Please explain why do you removed my page considering embedded linux PC?

Please explain why do you removed my page considering embedded linux PC? Do you know how to hard to write an article? I meant that wikipedia doesn't show behaviour of dmoz where editors delete competitors products 'just in case' Kdulep 00:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

The Fit-PC was a blatant advertisment. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a venue for advertisement. IrishGuy 00:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


oh yeah, like I am going to deal with this ass now.

later