Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:16, 24 May 2005

The Robertson Panel was a committee commissioned by the Central Intelligence Agency in 1952 in responses to widespread Unidentified Flying Object reports, especially in the Washington DC area. The panel was briefed on U.S. military activities and intelligence, hence the report was originally classified Secret.

Later declassified, the Robertson Panel's report concluded that most UFO reports could be explained as misidentification of mundane aerial objects, and the remaining minority could, in all likelihood, be similarly explained with further study.

The Robertson Panel concluded that a public relations campaign should be undertaken in order to reduce public interest in UFO's. Critics (including a few panel members) would later lament the Robertson Panel's role in making UFO's a somewhat disreputable field of study.

History

In 1952, so many civilians contacted various government agencies regarding UFO reports in that daily governmental duties were imapcted; the New York Times reported on August 1, 1952 that the many UFO reports had "regular intelligence work has been affected." The Baltimore Sun reported on July 31 that Air Force Chief of Staff Hoyt S. Vandenberg’s views that the recent spate of UFO sightings and reports had generated “mass hysteria”. There was a general concern among the military that the hysteria and confusion generated by UFO reports could be utilized by the United States’ enemies, primarily the Soviet Union.

The Air Force had earlier commissioned the Battelle Memorial Institute to scientifically study the various UFO reports collected by Project Sign, Project Grudge and Project Blue Book, but Battelle insisted they needed more time to conduct a proper study. The CIA thought the question so pressing that they authorized an ad hoc committee in late 1952.

The ‘’’Robertson Panel’’ first met formally on January 14, 1953 under the direction of H.P. Robertson. He was a physicist, a CIA employee and director of the Defense Department Weapons Evaluation Group.

Other panel members were respected scientists and military personnel who had worked on other classified military projects or studies. All were then skeptical of UFO reports, though to varying degrees:

• Louis Alvarez, physicist (and later, a Nobel Prize winner)
• Frederick C. Durrant, missile expert
• Samuel A. Goudsmit, Brookhaven National Laboratories physicist
• Thornton Page, astrophysicist, deputy director of Johns Hopkins’ Operations Research Office.
• Lloyd Berkner, physicist and J. Allen Hynek, astronomer, were associate panel members.

Formal Meetings

The Panel had four consecutive days of formal meetings.

The first day, they viewed two amateur motion pictures of UFO’s: the 1950 Montana UFO Film and 1952 Utah UFO Film (the latter was taken by Navy Chief Petty Officer Delbert C. Newhouse, who had extensive experience with aerial photography). Two Navy photograph and film analysts (Lieutenants R.S. Neasham and Harry Woo) then reported their conclusions: the two films depicted objects that were not any known aircraft, creature or weather phenomena. Air Force Captain Edward J. Rupelt then began a summary of Air Force efforts regarding UFO studies.

The second day, Rupelt finished his presentation. Hynek then discussed the Battelle study, and the panel discussed with Air Force personnel the problems inherent in monitoring UFO sightings.

The third day, Dewey J. Fournet spoke to the panel; for over a year he had coordinated UFO affairs for the Pentagon. Fournett supported the extraterrestrial hypothesis as the best explanation for some puzzling UFO reports. For the remainder of the third day, the panel discussed their conclusions, and Robertson agreed to draft a preliminary report.

The fourth and final day, the panel rewrote and finalized their report.

Conclusions

The Robertson Panel's official report concluded that 90 percent of UFO sightings could be readily identified with meteorological and astronomical phenomena, such as bright stars and planets, meteors, auroras, mirages, atmospheric temperature inversions, and lenticular clouds. Other sightings could be attributed to misinterpretation of conventional aircraft, weather balloons, birds, searchlights, kites, and other phenomena.

Furthermore, the Panel suggested the Air Force should begin a "debunking" effort to reduce "public gullibility" and demystify UFO reports. The panel suggested a public relations campaign, using psychiatrists, astronomers and assorted celebrities to significantly reduce public interest in UFO’s.

Their formal recommendation stated "That the national security agencies take immediate steps to strip the Unidentified Flying Objects of the special status they have been given and the aura of mystery they have unfortunately acquired."

Also recommended was that the government monitor civilian groups studying or researching UFO’s "because of their potentially great influence on mass thinking ... the apparent irresponsibility and possible use of such groups for subversive purposes should be kept in mind.'

The Robertson Panel’s conclusions and recommendations had a great influence on official United States policy regarding UFO’s for many decades.

The Robertson Panel’s study was classified for five years. In 1956, however, Rupelt made made the first public statements regarding the panel, when he offered a brief summary of its proceedings. Rupelt did not, however, note the panel members’ names, nor the government agencies represented.

Publicity and Responses

In 1958, NICAP, a civilian UFO research group, requested that the Air Force release the panel’s report. The Air Force released three summary paragraphs and the names of the panel’s members. In 1966 a nearly full-length version of the report was printed in the science column of the Saturday Review.

Panel member Thornton Page would later change some of his more stridently skeptical conclusions regarding the report, and regarding UFO’s in general

Hynek’s opinions changed in later years as well, so much that he became, to many, the scientifically respectable voice of Ufology. He would lament that the Robertson Panel had "made the subject of UFO’s scientifically unrespectable, and for nearly 20 years not enough attention was paid to the subject to acquire the kind of data needed even to decide the nature of the UFO phenomenon."

Sources

Jerome Clark, ‘’The UFO Book: Encyclopedia of the Extraterrestrial’’, ISBN 1578590299

• UFOs
• Central Intelligence Agency