| Revision as of 20:27, 27 August 2007 editAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,260 edits →Legal Tender Cases: P.S.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:30, 27 August 2007 edit undoAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,260 editsm →Legal Tender Cases: changing "about about" to "about"Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :All of the constitutional provisions that he relies on are now mentioned and linked in the article, but he wants them to be actually quoted verbatim in their entirety. Unfortunately, if we quoted all the relvant constitutional provisions in their entirety, then the article would become unwieldy, because there are so many constitutional provisions involved.] 20:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | :All of the constitutional provisions that he relies on are now mentioned and linked in the article, but he wants them to be actually quoted verbatim in their entirety. Unfortunately, if we quoted all the relvant constitutional provisions in their entirety, then the article would become unwieldy, because there are so many constitutional provisions involved.] 20:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :P.S. The ] article explicitly mentions and links to the Misplaced Pages article about the Tenth Amendment, and the article |
:P.S. The ] article explicitly mentions and links to the Misplaced Pages article about the Tenth Amendment, and the article about Article I, Section 8 (including the Necessary and Proper Clause plus the power to regulate the value of coins plus the power to borrow). The ] article also explicitly mentions and links to the Misplaced Pages article about Article I, Section 10 (including the states' power to make coins a legal tender plus the power of states to repel invasions). I just don't see how to do more to accommodate this person's concerns.] 20:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:30, 27 August 2007
 Archives |
|
/Archive 1 (8 March 2006 - 18 August 2007) |
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Legal Tender Cases
Hi Eastlaw. Your help would be appreciated at the Legal Tender Cases article. An anonymous user is insisting that paper money in unconstitutional. I've tried to be as accommodating as possible. Would you please review the situation? Thanks.Ferrylodge 19:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. If possible, I think it might be helpful if you would comment at the talk page for this article, in order to explain that statements must be backed up by sources, and that we cannot give undue weight to sources that argue against the way things have been for the past 150 years. The editor in question seems to think that the Constitution is unambiguous that paper money is forbidden, but that just ain't so.
- All of the constitutional provisions that he relies on are now mentioned and linked in the article, but he wants them to be actually quoted verbatim in their entirety. Unfortunately, if we quoted all the relvant constitutional provisions in their entirety, then the article would become unwieldy, because there are so many constitutional provisions involved.Ferrylodge 20:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. The Legal Tender Cases article explicitly mentions and links to the Misplaced Pages article about the Tenth Amendment, and the article about Article I, Section 8 (including the Necessary and Proper Clause plus the power to regulate the value of coins plus the power to borrow). The Legal Tender Cases article also explicitly mentions and links to the Misplaced Pages article about Article I, Section 10 (including the states' power to make coins a legal tender plus the power of states to repel invasions). I just don't see how to do more to accommodate this person's concerns.Ferrylodge 20:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)