| Revision as of 05:54, 7 September 2007 editIrpen (talk | contribs)32,604 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:03, 7 September 2007 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,661 edits →[]: delNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ::Apologies. An honest mistake on me, sorry. I thought better of Suva than stooping so low at the lever of ''that'' uses. . Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --] 05:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | ::Apologies. An honest mistake on me, sorry. I thought better of Suva than stooping so low at the lever of ''that'' uses. . Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --] 05:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' actually not connected for Stalinists or Neo Soviets, but created by request of someone on IRC with connection of some other stuff, but he will probably never get to use it. Might need better wording. But generally not done in bad faith. ] 04:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' actually not connected for Stalinists or Neo Soviets, but created by request of someone on IRC with connection of some other stuff, but he will probably never get to use it. Might need better wording. But generally not done in bad faith. ] 04:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *Speedy '''delete''' and advise Suva to stop using IRC channels. --]<sup>]</sup> 06:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
Revision as of 06:03, 7 September 2007
| < September 6 | September 8 > |
|---|
September 7
Template:Table Biology Prefixes And Suffixes
Redundant with Category:Biology prefixes and suffixes. — Swpb 15:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 21:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Woohookitty 05:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)--Woohookitty 05:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Template:Table suffixes
Redundant with Category:Suffixes. — Swpb 15:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 21:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Woohookitty 05:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC) --Woohookitty 05:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Template:Notpropaganda
Inflammatory and WP:POINTy template. --Irpen 05:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - under criteria WP:CSD#T1 — Jack · talk · 03:45, Friday, 7 September 2007
- Delete, too general, should be replaced with a ], no, that might be taken as a facetious, I propose ] which is the actual intent of the template. Perhaps such a "fair warning sticker" would cut down on denouncements of less than glorious portrayals of Soviet power in the Baltics and Eastern Europe as Nazi hate speech and Holocaust denial. — Pēters J. Vecrumba 03:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per T1 and G10 Alex Bakharev 03:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment, what's so inflammatory about it? Have you guys lost your sense of humour, or is it, in the words of a certain playwright: the lady doth protest to much? Martintg 04:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- PS, the "notoriously disruptive user with a past history of similar craft" mentioned above didn't actually create it, so I've struck that section. Martintg 04:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies. An honest mistake on me, sorry. I thought better of Suva than stooping so low at the lever of that uses. Corrected the nomination. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --Irpen 05:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep actually not connected for Stalinists or Neo Soviets, but created by request of someone on IRC with connection of some other stuff, but he will probably never get to use it. Might need better wording. But generally not done in bad faith. Suva 04:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and advise Suva to stop using IRC channels. --Ghirla 06:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Template:Paradox games
This template is unused, it has been replaced by newer templates. — MrStalker 12:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. - Koweja 12:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not exactly convinced that the newer templates are better. For example, Template:Victoria series: templates like that are frequently deleted at TFD. Gracenotes § 02:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, replace the new templates with the old one and then nominate the new ones for deletion. Gracenotes is right, there are really too few links for the new versions to be useful navboxes. IronGargoyle 04:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Then there shouldn't have navboxes at all. Why keep a group of unrelated articles in a navbox? Just because they are from the same developer? What would it look like if you put all games from Electronic Arts or Ubisoft in one navbox? The navboxes exists to guide readers between related articles. If they want a list of titles made by one developer they should just look at the article about that developer or in a category. --MrStalker 12:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IronGargoyle 02:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC) - Keep, templates should not be considered for deletion only because certain user created it. It can be reworked, but to delete it would be wrong. --Hillock65 03:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Template:Rollback
Template that was originally proposed at requests for rollback, a rejected proposal. Unused, probably never will be, and should be deleted. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 12:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unusable since the policy was rejected. - Koweja 12:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with requests for rollback, aside from mention of the rollback tool. That said, I as the creator have no opinion on its deletion. —{admin} Pathoschild 00:35:26, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect {{Rollback}} to {{uw-vandalism2}}; move {{Rollback2}} to Misplaced Pages:Requests for rollback/Template:Rollback2 (no reason not to preserve it). Gracenotes § 02:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IronGargoyle 02:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)