| Revision as of 07:54, 17 June 2005 editSuruena (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,767 edits '''Support''' move also 200m and 400m← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:51, 20 June 2005 edit undoBobblewik (talk | contribs)66,026 editsm I am beginning to wonder if we should have a policy of using full unit names for article titles by default.Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * '''Support''' move to ]. ] ] 00:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) | * '''Support''' move to ]. ] ] 00:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I notice that some articles put the unit name in full e.g. ]. Others use the symbol form. I am beginning to wonder if we should have a policy of using full unit names for article titles by default. ] ] 21:51, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:51, 20 June 2005
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.
Can somebody change the article name to '100 m'? Bobblewik (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- I'm agree, the name of the article should be "100 m" and not "100m". It can't be moved easily because previously 100 m was a redirection to other page, so an administrator must do the movement. --surueña 08:00, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
- I agree and we need to consider the same thing for 200m and 400m that are also incorrectly named. David D. 22:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support move also 200m and 400m (and there is no need to move the articles 4x100 m relay, 4x400 m relay). --surueña 07:54, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
- I agree and we need to consider the same thing for 200m and 400m that are also incorrectly named. David D. 22:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I notice that some articles put the unit name in full e.g. Athletics at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Men's 100 metres. Others use the symbol form. I am beginning to wonder if we should have a policy of using full unit names for article titles by default. Bobblewik (talk) 21:51, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)