| Revision as of 23:17, 8 September 2007 editChrisTheDude (talk | contribs)Administrators123,546 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:30, 8 September 2007 edit undoNumber 57 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators292,866 edits change vote to keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>—User:Ceyockey (<small>'']''</small>) 21:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>—User:Ceyockey (<small>'']''</small>) 21:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | ||
| * '''Delete''' total absence of independent sources. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 21:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' total absence of independent sources. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 21:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Clubs plays below step 7 and has no reason for notability. ] ]] 22:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | *<s>'''Delete''' Clubs plays below step 7 and has no reason for notability. ] ]] 22:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</s> '''Keep''' New evidence from ] shows the club has played at a notable level in the past. ] ]] 23:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>This discussion has been included in ]'s list of football (soccer) related deletions. ] 23:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | *<small>This discussion has been included in ]'s list of football (soccer) related deletions. ] 23:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Weak keep''' as per , the team has in the past played as high as the ] Premier Division, which is at step 5 and therefore within the generally-agreed notability guidelines. Article could do with expansion/improvement, though..... ] 23:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | *'''Weak keep''' as per , the team has in the past played as high as the ] Premier Division, which is at step 5 and therefore within the generally-agreed notability guidelines. Article could do with expansion/improvement, though..... ] 23:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:30, 8 September 2007
Watton United F.C.
AfDs for this article:- Watton United F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
procedural nomination Previously considered as part of a mass-AFD Aug 2006 with result 'keep'; tagged for PROD-based deletion Sept 2007 but should have been brought back here. The original AFD discussion began with an assertion that the F.C. did not meet WP:CORP. The Sep 2007 PROD was accompanied by the following assetion: "Amateur football club playing below Step 7 and having never played above that level. No other apparent reason for notability (e.g. cup run)." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of football (soccer)-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete total absence of independent sources. Guy (Help!) 21:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Clubs plays below step 7 and has no reason for notability. Number 57 22:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Keep New evidence from ChrisTheDude shows the club has played at a notable level in the past. Number 57 23:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 23:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep as per the Football Club History Database, the team has in the past played as high as the Eastern Counties League Premier Division, which is at step 5 and therefore within the generally-agreed notability guidelines. Article could do with expansion/improvement, though..... ChrisTheDude 23:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)