Misplaced Pages

Talk:WCAU: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:30, 24 June 2005 editCalton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users78,494 edits Not vandalism← Previous edit Revision as of 11:33, 24 June 2005 edit undo213.184.21.88 (talk) Not vandalismNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
**The "establishment" = vast majority of admins on here, they are not the anti-Philadelpia gang, who are {{User|Spotteddogsdotorg}}, and his minions {{user|209.137.173.69}}, {{user|68.83.229.241}}, {{user|Toasthaven}}, {{user|Hohokus}}, {{user|ConeyCyclone}}, et al while all have not made anti-phildelphia edits, basied on my resarch and that of others that these useres are either the same person or or working in coridination with each other, espically in vfd, on pov unsourced edits, to creat general distruption among other things. --] | ] 08:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) **The "establishment" = vast majority of admins on here, they are not the anti-Philadelpia gang, who are {{User|Spotteddogsdotorg}}, and his minions {{user|209.137.173.69}}, {{user|68.83.229.241}}, {{user|Toasthaven}}, {{user|Hohokus}}, {{user|ConeyCyclone}}, et al while all have not made anti-phildelphia edits, basied on my resarch and that of others that these useres are either the same person or or working in coridination with each other, espically in vfd, on pov unsourced edits, to creat general distruption among other things. --] | ] 08:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
***Buh? First you rail on about the "establishment" supporting "massive anti-Philadelphia bias", and now you say they (whoever "they" are) aren't? You're making less and less sense with each edit. --] | ] 11:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) ***Buh? First you rail on about the "establishment" supporting "massive anti-Philadelphia bias", and now you say they (whoever "they" are) aren't? You're making less and less sense with each edit. --] | ] 11:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

**what ever, and your just a tool for the admins that would rahter suppress content, and support adbusive lying admins --] 11:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:33, 24 June 2005

CBS did not merge with Westinghouse in 1994; that came later in 1995-6. See KYW-TV for the correct order of events.

Also, the title of this article is incorrect. The station's callsign is WCAU, not WCAU-TV. According to the FCC database, WCAU-TV became WCAU on 10/06/1995, so it happened under NBC ownership. 18.26.0.18 00:22, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)


To the anon: why did you remove the section I added on John Zacherle? -- Decumanus 22:55, 2005 May 31 (UTC)

Not vandalism

Neither of you are vandals. This is an edit war. Page is protected. Talk it out please. Thanks. Rhobite 08:14, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

  • Their is nothing to discuss, their has been a newer extensive article on the subject, that article has not been given due considertion by either users or admins, "establishment", the subject now meets that creteria that mutt and his minons, who have shown threw their edits a massive anti-Philadelphia bias, would list as a creditable person, so their is no reason to de link or speedy the subject in question, and an perosn that does i will consider a vandal or an admin who is abusing their privildges, and re link and recreat the article. But being that i am dealing with the "establishment" , who only seem to work in their best intrests and not in the best intrest of the regular credible user, or in the protection of this site as a vaid source of information of the web, as it is becoming more of a soure wikipedia needs to evolve and reform. As far as i am concerned this discussion is over. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • The "establishment"? What, pray tell, are the motivations of this evil "establishment", the powers-that-be, for their "massive anti-Philadelphia bias"? --Calton | Talk 08:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • The "establishment" = vast majority of admins on here, they are not the anti-Philadelpia gang, who are Spotteddogsdotorg (talk · contribs), and his minions 209.137.173.69 (talk · contribs), 68.83.229.241 (talk · contribs), Toasthaven (talk · contribs), Hohokus (talk · contribs), ConeyCyclone (talk · contribs), et al while all have not made anti-phildelphia edits, basied on my resarch and that of others that these useres are either the same person or or working in coridination with each other, espically in vfd, on pov unsourced edits, to creat general distruption among other things. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Buh? First you rail on about the "establishment" supporting "massive anti-Philadelphia bias", and now you say they (whoever "they" are) aren't? You're making less and less sense with each edit. --Calton | Talk 11:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • what ever, and your just a tool for the admins that would rahter suppress content, and support adbusive lying admins --213.184.21.88 11:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)