Misplaced Pages

User talk:71.252.83.230: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:02, 15 September 2007 edit71.252.83.230 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:14, 15 September 2007 edit undoLuk (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators44,791 edits unblock reviewedNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
{{unblock reviewed|1=This is an apparent nonsense due to the fact that this is a public IP address that is mapped to many private addresses - checked with Verizon ISP Customer Service represenattive|decline=Let it be noted that I am a checkuser and I have validated the correlation between this IP and the disruptive user Velebit and his socks. Who asked for the check is not a relevant matter. I will be happy to review the evidence with other CUs. — ++]: ]/] 04:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=This is an apparent nonsense due to the fact that this is a public IP address that is mapped to many private addresses - checked with Verizon ISP Customer Service represenattive|decline=Let it be noted that I am a checkuser and I have validated the correlation between this IP and the disruptive user Velebit and his socks. Who asked for the check is not a relevant matter. I will be happy to review the evidence with other CUs. — ++]: ]/] 04:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)}}


{{unblock|First of all, the claim is "Abusing multiple accounts: Only used by socks of Velebit/Guivon". As I already checked with Verizon ISP Customer Service representative - their NAT service maps this public IP address to many private IP addresses. This Lar as a checkuser must know that a public IP address is not a unique identification of a user. I never used any accounts attributed frivolously to me. My edits were: added a reference to Sajmiste concentration camp paragraph, refused removal a few sentences from Neo-Nazism, Croatia and refused changes in the Ante Pavelic introductory. Explained reasons in the subject lines and on the talk page. So, nothing disruptive, rather legal and honest. All malicious text on this talk pages I have full rights to remove any time. It is too apparent that this Lar abused his/her checkuser and administrator rights in order to support others who are on some friendly terms with her/him and who harassed me this way. I am definitely going to present this case to the Misplaced Pages arbitration committee - no matter would someone remove this block or not --] 20:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)}} {{unblock-reviewed|First of all, the claim is "Abusing multiple accounts: Only used by socks of Velebit/Guivon". As I already checked with Verizon ISP Customer Service representative - their NAT service maps this public IP address to many private IP addresses. This Lar as a checkuser must know that a public IP address is not a unique identification of a user. I never used any accounts attributed frivolously to me. My edits were: added a reference to Sajmiste concentration camp paragraph, refused removal a few sentences from Neo-Nazism, Croatia and refused changes in the Ante Pavelic introductory. Explained reasons in the subject lines and on the talk page. So, nothing disruptive, rather legal and honest. All malicious text on this talk pages I have full rights to remove any time. It is too apparent that this Lar abused his/her checkuser and administrator rights in order to support others who are on some friendly terms with her/him and who harassed me this way. I am definitely going to present this case to the Misplaced Pages arbitration committee - no matter would someone remove this block or not --] 20:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)|decline=The involved checkuser declined your request. I'll point him to your message but only him, an other checkuser, or a member of the ] is allowed to process this request. Meanwhile, your ability to read Misplaced Pages articles is not impacted. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 20:14, 15 September 2007

Regarding edits made during January 12 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Prolog 21:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppet

Multi-user iconAn editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Velebit (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.
Account information: block logcontribslogsabuse logCentralAuth

Spylab 17:19, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Your recent contribution to your talk page has been reverted or removed. Although this is your talk page, making such edits are considered vandalism and will be reverted. If you continue, this talk page may be protected from editing. Thank you. Cheers, Lights 00:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make disruptive edits to your talk page such as blanking it or adding offensive content, you will not be able to edit it. Thank you. Cheers, Lights 00:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you blank out or make disruptive edits to your talk page, the page will be protected. Cheers, Lights 00:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 months

Misplaced Pages's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Misplaced Pages. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.
Misplaced Pages tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

This IP has been blocked for 3 months as it is only used by Velebit and socks. Reversion of this message or any other warnings presently on the page will result in page protection to prevent disruptive edits. Admins: Do not unblock without contacting a checkuser. ++Lar: t/c 17:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

User Lar

Let to be noted that not a single checkuser ever claimed this nonsense! Apparently aligned with Croatian nationalists - see here --71.252.83.230 01:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.252.83.230 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is an apparent nonsense due to the fact that this is a public IP address that is mapped to many private addresses - checked with Verizon ISP Customer Service represenattive

Decline reason:

Let it be noted that I am a checkuser and I have validated the correlation between this IP and the disruptive user Velebit and his socks. Who asked for the check is not a relevant matter. I will be happy to review the evidence with other CUs. — ++Lar: t/c 04:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.252.83.230 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First of all, the claim is "Abusing multiple accounts: Only used by socks of Velebit/Guivon". As I already checked with Verizon ISP Customer Service representative - their NAT service maps this public IP address to many private IP addresses. This Lar as a checkuser must know that a public IP address is not a unique identification of a user. I never used any accounts attributed frivolously to me. My edits were: added a reference to Sajmiste concentration camp paragraph, refused removal a few sentences from Neo-Nazism, Croatia and refused changes in the Ante Pavelic introductory. Explained reasons in the subject lines and on the talk page. So, nothing disruptive, rather legal and honest. All malicious text on this talk pages I have full rights to remove any time. It is too apparent that this Lar abused his/her checkuser and administrator rights in order to support others who are on some friendly terms with her/him and who harassed me this way. I am definitely going to present this case to the Misplaced Pages arbitration committee - no matter would someone remove this block or not --71.252.83.230 20:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The involved checkuser declined your request. I'll point him to your message but only him, an other checkuser, or a member of the WP:ARBCOM is allowed to process this request. Meanwhile, your ability to read Misplaced Pages articles is not impacted. -- lucasbfr 20:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Category: