Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:31, 17 September 2007

,

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Erechtheus, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ForestH2 22:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Why?

Why did you try to make speedy deletion of the page U.Z.Z. I am its creator. And I want to know why.

-This part is made invalid do to the apology sent by me- U.Z.Z. creator.

Glincelania

Sorry, I'm new. Do you want me to put in stats? Like, I'm not sure the exact number of people killed or anything. I'm not really sure what you'd like. What would you include?Template:Unsigned:Effervescence92

Liver Families article deletion

Hi Erechtheus - No problem at all with deleting my article - it didn't meet the encyclopedia criteria! And now that I know about the criteria, I agree with it. Thanks for the note on my user page.

For me, the issues with using wikipedia are that I am so, so busy, and the few times I have time to write I don't also have time to wander through all of wikipedia's rules. For me, the time choice is one or the other - contribute, or learn the rules, which can mean hours and hours of wading through policies which may or may not be relevant. At which point I lose the train of thought about what I wanted to contribute in the first place. Sometimes it's easier to contribute and then let someone who actually knows the current policies (and where to find them) edit.

...and BTW, I have a question - all of the users I've met so far are men? Nice men, but is that just an odd coincidence or are there more men using wikipedia than women?

Pls respond on my user page, as the chance that I'll make it back here is slim.:) - Aunt Amanda

Comments on The Jolly Rancher Story

I saw that you claimed that I was adding nonesence to the article. I don't exactly understand what you are referring to. I added valid sources that legitimize the claims that the story has spread. I certainly don't think this constitutes vandalism.

Your User Page is funny

Thanks for your message. _________________________________________________________ Yours truly, Ume$h Ghosh Blog http://umesh4ever.blogspot.com Orkut http://www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=3632382679451682289 Yahoo Messenger (redacted by Erechtheus) MySpace www.myspace.com/umesh1985 Esnips(Free ebooks and my songs) www.esnips.com/UserProfileAction.ns?id=c7449333-3ba6-40fc-8199-207120342dee _________________________________________________________

The Halo's RfA

Erechtheus... Thank you very much for your support in my request for adminship. Ultimately, no consensus was reached, and I failed to be promoted, but I am very grateful for your support. Erechtheus, thank you for your supporting opinions. Your trust in me to use the tools means a lot, and I hope that I can live up to your standards at some point in the future. Yours, Thε Halo

Tuoba Heru

so yeah....ok if it bothers you that much, then by all means tag it with an unsourced tag....Abstrakt

Notability Flag on Alana Grace Article

Please note that Alana Grace's songs on MySpace have been played over 400,000 times. Many people are interested in her music.

With this in mind, I would be grateful if you would remove the notability flag on the Alana Grace article.

Thanks,

User:JD_Fan

Revisiting Alana Grace

Given that more music is being marketed and sold on-line, I would argue that plays on MySpace should be one criterion among several for notability. Perhaps that policy needs updating, especially since artists will soon be selling music directly to the public by way of MySpace. Please see the article on this in the Washington Post.

Please note that Alana Grace has a song on the soundtrack CD for the movie "Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants" (a movie that grossed $40 M). I would argue that being included on the same CD as established artists such as Chantal Kreviazuk and Natasha Bedingfield is itself a mark of notability - especially when a number of the reviews (e.g., on Amazon) said that the song by Alana Grace was one of the strongest tracks on the CD. Some even said that the CD was worth buying for that track alone. In fact, her song on that soundtrack/CD attracted so much attention that she was invited to sing it live on national television (on the Today show on NBC). That CD has been out for about 18 months and is currently ranked about 7,000 on Amazon - not bad for a CD that has been out that long. The Amazon reviews are at:

As for tours, Alana Grace toured California last summer as the opening act for Ashlee Simpson, which gave her some visibility in that market. However, I wouldn't say that she sounds anything like Ashlee Simpson (much better, much stronger, in my opinion). Listen to her songs on MySpace, and see what you think.

On a point of more general policy, I would argue that the Misplaced Pages is particularly useful for finding out about new and emerging artists, and it would be good to have some flexibility in evolving, adapting, and applying the criteria of notability. For my part, I am always looking for new music by new artists (e.g., by following the "Listeners Also Bought" leads from one singer to another) - and whenever I do find a new artist, I always start with the Misplaced Pages article (if it exists) on that singer.

User:JD_Fan

Notability Criteria for Musicians

Thanks for making me aware of the notability criteria. I have added my own set of comments to the talk page for these criteria, on "Niche Markets + New and Emerging Artists". Please see:

PS: The comments on that talk page mostly refer to artists outside the USA. Generally, I write about Canadian musicians - but I believe in recognizing quality wherever it is found, which is why I wrote about Alana Grace, an American musician (whom I think will do very well here once her CD comes out in early 2007).

User:JD_Fan

Duocharles

HI I'm just letting you know that I'm acting on behalf of the 5000 Role Models of Excellence Project in creating their page for the encyclopedia. The content is copyright to the non-profit organization therefore with prior permission I was able to go ahead and "create" the page as for the image I do not know how to remove/ re-upload it

Manos (album)

So what sources are necessary for an album which is a stub. I can't think what information on there could possibly require verification. As you stated, I've searched and found many albums, some with actual information besides a track listing, which don't have references.

Quoting WP:V: "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a reliable source, which should be cited in the article"

I don't understand how a track listing of an album is likely to be challenged. Are you challenging the validity of this? If not, then WP:V says it doesn't require a source, to my reading.

Marucci Bat Company

Can you give another look to that page? I added some references.

M3 line

Meh i'm less than fussed about how you view me, with a negative shadow or not. But hey, I'm glad that you managed to understand what i wrote, and well done on your efforts to help Misplaced Pages, I'm sure proud of you.

Postal Order articles

I am hoping that someone from the Numismatics Wikiproject may have an example of postal orders to illustrate articles such as Postal Orders of South West Africa in the same way that someone has illustrated the article Postal Orders of Ireland. - (Numismaticman 03:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC))

Good evening. Thanks for looking at my article on Thomas Billing. I can't pretend it took me many hours to compile - it was lifted straight from the DNB. But is it rightly described as a "stub"? After all, how much does anyone want to be told about a 15th century English judge?

45ossington 21:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

In fact, someone called Splash has now promoted it to B, which may be a step too far in the other direction - who knows? Anyway, I'm sure Billing would be flattered to know that people were still taking an interest in his career 500 years on.

45ossington 09:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Route 59 (Metra) Source

Don't tell me that Metra itself isn't a reliable source for this article(http://metrarail.com/Sched/bn/hy59.shtml). They've got an image of the station, a map of the parking areas, the bus connections and other details. So why the tag? ---- DanTD 01:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, if you know of any other source, bring it on. I'm hoping it's some train-lover from the suburbs of Chicago, because they should know a lot better than I would. ---- DanTD 04:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Historic landscape characterisation

You recently tagged the article on historic landscape characterisation with the primarysources template. I usually regard English Heritage as a reliable source. What sort of references do you think the article needs? Rjm at sleepers 17:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

I've added a couple of non English Heritage references. Have a look and see whether they are sufficient to remove the tag. Rjm at sleepers 18:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that was quick - cheers. Rjm at sleepers 18:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

What?

Are you sending a welcome tag to me as if I vandalized? LOL What is this? I see you're looking for pages to tag them. Sources for an album are unnecessary. Information can found be via the page of the singer. See I'm Your Baby Tonight by Whitney Houston. There is so much of information there, and not even one source, so please find another task. The next time I'll turn to an administrator. --Shahid • 17:13, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Who are you? Get out of my way! Stop re-adding this stupid template of welcome, I'm not a newcomer here. I'm creating pages. Nobody took care and I'm trying to help. It comes from the official site of Yolandita Monge - here is the link . And in WP:A there is nothing like this indicated so don't make up stories please. --Shahid • 17:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability?

Jeremie Belpois, a character from Code Lyoko, IS notable. There, the article should NOT be deleted. Please do not add the maintenance tags again. Thank you. Angie Y. 12:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

John Tyndall Award

You added:

This article or section needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Alone, primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of this article are not sufficient for an accurate encyclopedia article. Please include more appropriate citations from reliable sources.

My comment:

It seems to me that the organization that gives an award is the best authority about the award criteria and its recipients to date. Who do you consider a "more appropriate citation from reliable sources"?

With all best wishes, Daderot 23:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

There are actually two issues here. The first is WP:RS. I encourage you to read about primary versus secondary sourcing. The second is WP:N. That is really the same issue if you ask me, but it is perhaps a better explanation. The questions are not only whether the information is reliable but also whether these awards matter enough to have an article here. I think they probably do, but this will be a better article when attributed third party commentary is included. Please don't take the template as a slam on your work. I love seeing the encyclopedia expand. I just want to make sure it is the best encyclopedia it can be. That's why I spend a lot of my editing effort adding these sorts of editorial templates. Erechtheus 23:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your notes, which are much appreciated. Let me respond to your two points in turn. As for Reliable Sources (WP:RS), I quote: "Academic and peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources in areas where they are available, such as history, medicine and science." Please note that the IEEE and OSA are two of the most respected scientific organizations in the world; thus I think their reliability in scientific matters is acceptable. Your second point is Notability (WP:N). Here I quote: "The common theme in the notability guidelines is the requirement for verifiable objective evidence to support a claim of notability. Substantial coverage in reliable sources constitutes such objective evidence, as do published peer recognition and the other factors listed in the subject specific guidelines." Here it seems that published peer recognition is the essential criterion, and is surely the case for IEEE and OSA awards. With all best wishes, Daderot 00:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC).

Italian basketball teams

Hi,

I have noticed you have been adding sources tags to some of the Italian basketball teams pages I have been creating. I just wanted to let you know that those tags are totally justified, and I wish that somebody would find some better sources. I'm using the official websites for the Italian League and Italian Misplaced Pages to add history and rosters for now, so that at least there are stubs in place. Teams' own websites are non-independent sources, obviously, but is the league's site a "third-party reliable" source? Sounds borderline to me. In any case, I have no access to the Italian libraries and Google News Archive does not have much in the way of old Italian newspapers - hope that somebody who has access to those will source those articles better. Cheers and enjoy your day! Karaboom 00:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

{{sources}}

You are using the {{sources}} tag rather a lot- generally, that is used when articles need more sources than they already have, because the claims they make can't really be verified by what the sources say, or because of the nature of the source compared to the nature of the statement. A more appropriate tag for the new articles you are tagging would be {{unref}}. J Milburn 00:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Public Ledger

Are you satisfied with my References - consisting of the paper(s) itself/themselvers? --Ludvikus 02:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Request For Assistance, re: Maureen Long

Hi, hoped you might take a look at my questions in the Discussion section of the "Maureen Long" article I created. Any help would be appreciated. Best, Sir Rhosis 02:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Request for Assistance re: Robert M. O'Neil

Hi--started a thread on the Talk page for Robert M. O’Neil. If you have an opportunity to clarify any specific concerns that would be very helpful to me. Tjarrett 15:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation tag on Tvisha

Hi there, I noticed that you had flagged the Tvisha article. Which other article's are out there referring to the same name? rahul 16:58, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Greetings Erechtheus

Two things (look - no apostrophe!): Some of the templates on your user page are great - are they copyright or in the public domain ('cos I'd love to use a couple of 'em on my own page)? Secondly, we met up, briefly, on a page I started recently. Although its (see, no ') continued existence is slightly doubtful due to the polemic involved, I'd like it to be kept there as long as possible 'cos there's a lot at stake and it's only a matter of time time before it becomes a victim of vandalism. So, the bottom line is, can I count on your experience here at Misplaced Pages to help eke out its shaky future? If not, quite understand, and would appreciate neutral comments on how to improve it. No need to answer this plea - actions speak louder than words. Well, regarding the templates, would appreciate something. Regards, --Technopat 21:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

PS

Forgot to ask: Is the Chewbacca Defense applicable in this case? Not being well versed in jurisprudence has its limitatations. Regs., --Technopat 21:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Greetings again, Erechtheus

Thanks for your prompt reply. In answer to your questions (can't remember order):

a) your template

b) San Glorio
c) I signed - I nearly always remember - and this time was no different. Regards, --Technopat 00:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Many thanks, and the same (happy editing) to you! Regs. --Technopat 00:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Bands Against Bush

Hi, I reviewed your speedy delete request for this article. I believe speedy delete is not appropriate because despite a lack of sources and although it may well not ultimately have any, the article does claim notability, was founded by a notable figure, and is not an obvious prank or advertisement. For this reason, I believe either the proposed deletion or the regular articles for deletion approach, which takes longer and gives authors of unsourced articles an opportunity to provide sources and justify notability before deletion, would be the better approach. I believe speedy deletes are reserved for cases where lack of notability etc. is completely obvious. Best, --Shirahadasha 00:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I believe the general rule is that speedy deletion is to be enforced only if an article inappropriateness is obvious. We get plenty of articles written by 12-year-olds about their garage bands and love interests. Also things like attack articles, wholesale copies of website pages, and the like. If there's a chance it might possibly be legit, better to use one of the other processes. Articles for deletion involves a discussion by the community open for several days. This gives supporters and bystanders an opportunity to dig up sources and strengthen it if they can. Best, --Shirahadasha 00:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Misuse of notability tags

Hello, I recently noticed that you tagged Hypocrisy (band) with a notability tag and would like to point out that your tag is not justified. I do not know if you are aware of the criteria set forth for notability in WP:MUSIC, but even if you are, I would highly recommend you go read it. Hypocrisy clearly meets criteria #5, #4, and #1 under WP:MUSIC#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. --Leon Sword 01:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Just because you have never heard of a label or band does not mean it must not be notable. If you do a bit of research you'll find that Nuclear Blast is indeed a very notable label, in fact it is not even considered an indy label, it's considered a major label. And the misuse bit is true, as I have noticed you have wrongfully tagged other articles that met several WP:MUSIC criteria, furthermore, other editors have apparently expressed concerns over your notability tags. Yes, your notability tag on the Hypocrisy article was unjustified since the article clearly claims notability. --Leon Sword 02:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Nuclear Blast may not be a RIAA label, it is an independent label but is considered major because they release their albums worldwide and have signed various charting bands such as In Flames, Nightwish, HammerFall and others. A quick google search will prove my point that Hypocrisy indeed meets criteria #1 and #4, but that is pointless because a band only needs to meet one criteria to be considered notable and Hypocrisy already clearly meets #5. Also, Hypocrisy is not my pet project, I just happened to notice your edit. By the way, you seem to have the impression that I'm the one who is not familiar with Wiki policies and guidelines, when in reality I've been here a while and have contributed to several articles and I'm very familiar with the way Wiki works. You should try to spend more time editing than tagging articles with tags you clearly have not learned to use correctly. --Leon Sword 02:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

In regards to War (Swedish band), you think it should be redirect huh? Should we redirect it then to Dark Funeral, Hypocrisy, or Abruptum? The band has released multiple albums of its own on a label, so it definately qualifies for its own article and if you do a quick google search, you'll find that it meets criteria #1 as well. --Leon Sword 02:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Again Nuclear Blast is not major in the sense that it is a RIAA label, it's a major in the sense of it's established prominence in music. I guess a better way to put it is how it's worded in WP:MUSIC, "one of the more important indy labels". I don't know how you got the impression that I was attacking you since I never threw an offensive remark your way. Responding to your comments consistenly (without using any offensive language) is not attacking you. I agree that it is not your job to do quick google searches, but even so the tags were still unjustified because both articles (Hypocrisy and War) claimed notability by stating that the bands have released multiple albums through labels. By the way, I can see your side of this, I myself have done my fair share (and continue to do so every once in a while) of tagging random articles for this or that. --Leon Sword 03:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

cmyos

The notability says that web content counts as notable and as noted, cmyos is part of only a few current free & open web operating systems that are online right now. I would say this justifies the article. --Maxeboy 04:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Marcela Carena

The "one of theleading women in science" phrase has been removed, though it is a fact. Please remove the notability flag Marcela Carena, or specify what it is aimed at. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pertin (talk • contribs) 22:36, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

WNBA Peak Performers

I added some more information to the WNBA peak performer page. Hopefully it's enough to be included towards the WNBA page/ catagories.ELO MnLynx Fan77 14:19, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Spaced

Hi, sorry but in my impatience to tidy up the original Spaced page i forgot about moving the the appropriate references from there to the character page. My bad. Radical AdZ 17:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Crometeo article

Thank you for the warning about the lacking references. I will try to supply them in the near future. Humanist505 18:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Batman Films

Thanks. I was about to {prod2} it because I shared your concerns, then I had a sudden moment of inspiration... Hellosandimas 00:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

By-elections

By elections are mostly for choosing replacement pollies, if an incumbent member retires unexpectedly. -Malkinann 01:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, they're pretty rare occurrences - that's why two in the same election are so unusual. -Malkinann 02:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Rebecca brindley

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rebecca brindley, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rebecca brindley is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rebecca brindley, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Parks in San Diego, California

Please stop adding Template:unref to Parks in San Diego, California. I have reverted your edit and you have reverted it back again. There is nothing that needs to be sourced on that article; therefore, no citations are needed. Thanks. —Christopher Mann McKay 10:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

JayPaul S. Ahluwalia

I read the article carelessly and thought it was an advertisement for the company named in it. Your tag was correct, so I removed mine. --Rrburke 04:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Red State Update

...Why was it deleted? CNN and Salon.com seem like reliable enough sources to me... I actually created it because it was listed on Misplaced Pages:Requested articles/Social sciences and I happen to be a fan. Rompe 21:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Suburban Noize Records Compilations

I see many are concerned in why you are notability templates that will soon be considered for deletion. In my case, I am concerned in Suburban Noize Presents: Sub-Noize Rats and The Royal Family albums. You are saying that they don't fit the discription for a reliable article. These are simple albums that has little information. Many albums placed on Misplaced Pages do not have the greatest amount of work. The most that is possible for fixing is to add which albums some of these tracks are included on, but other than that this album has its full discriptions. And yes I understand the reference template. Thank You. Apologies2all 19:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I've seen you tagging behind my English bishops creation spree, and just wanted to say thanks for the help! Ealdgyth | Talk 03:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Suburban Noize Records Compilations

Please stop mistagging the Suburban Noize Compilation albums. Suburban Noize Records is a label known worlwide, also including a branch in Japan, Suburban Noize Japan. You keep repeatedly mistagging because you may possibly be looking to earn more achievements by deleting bands/labels you don't know of or possibly just mistakingly thinking its not notable, but they indeed are a well known company. If it is for the possibility that there is no Suburban Noize Records page, then blame that on the mistaggers who have gotten it block with no given reason. The albums are notable. Apologies2all 20:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

OpenThesaurus

Would you like to check it again? Are the sources okay now? (Note the talk page)--Speck-Made 20:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

John Hugh McNary

What more needs to be added to make the above not a stub? Aboutmovies 00:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Phillipsburg, Ontario

WP:SOFIXIT. Or tag it for WP:CLEANUP. Wl219 16:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Astibo

chill man, I just wrote the line, I will add sources later and hopefully expand it when I have time :) Capricornis 01:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Picnic (sampler album)

chill man, I just wrote the line, I will add sources later and hopefully expand it likewise, I'm working on it. --Rodhullandemu 03:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice, I've only been here a few weeks and the "Under Construction" tag is new to me; I have left an editorial note on the page but if you can point me at the tag it would save me some time. I may point out I've been editing solidly for 16 hours and need some sleep- once I can leave this page in a state where I can come back & pick up tomorrow, that will be it for tonight. --Rodhullandemu 03:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Done. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu 03:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Templates

I noticed that you added such templates in Save the Drama for Your Llama. This is kind of unfair. Howcome articles of the same category aren't being given similar tags? FoxLad 04:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Reliable source

Isn't the FIBA America official website a reliable source of the FIBA America Championship? the same for Oceania..Calapez 14:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Once Again?

You simply seem to be adding these templates to be rewarded for your additional offers to wiki. This template was correct when placed for the Suburban Noize Compilatiojn albums for the simple fact that Suburban Noize Records has no page. (Once again it has been decided to stay blocked by the adminisrators). The proble, is that you label the Sub Noize Souljaz page with a notability tag when this is outrageous. It is obviously notable for the group known as the Subnoize Souljaz and the reference is perfect for it shows full details in the album. I simply summarized the official site's discription. Look at the page and you'll notice it explains the album. You happen to enjoy mistagging and if this continues it will be notified for vandalism. --Apologies2all 19:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Droppin Bombs

Since you seem to be an "expert" wikipedian, may I please ask you if the references included in the Droppin Bombs article are propers resources. I believe that the official Billboard listings happen to be great references, but at the same time you happen to say that my others are not good enough so hopefully now they are. --Apologies2all 15:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

I was to some point getting irritated by the tag, but I did know it was for the best interest of the artices. I have noticed that All Music happens to be a popular source and I personally think it's great, but Billboard has always been my main source. Either way they both work and I appreciate the help for the article. As for Suburban Noize Records.... I have requested it be unprotected or atleast semi-protected, but it has'nt been approved. The first deletion was reasonable, but the second was done with no reason given. Hopefully, I can get the page up and along with other create what can be a great article. --Apologies2all 17:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Is there some reason...

Is there some reason you didn't follow the recommended courtesy of giving the article creator a heads-up when you nominated Gaillard Hunt for {{db-bio}}? Geo Swan 21:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Unref

Just wanted to let you know that you dont have to go tagging all of my new articles; I am aware that there need to be references, I just havn't done them yet; they should be completed by tomorrow night. Gizzakk 02:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I've just had a few instances of people "following" me around and tagging things that I am in the process of improving and it gets exceedingly annoying. Good luck to you as well! Gizzakk 03:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Ryulong

Ryulong took off my article before I was going to improve it. It pisses me off and this person has to put back my articles or else i will have him kick off the Administrators list.--Stco23 06:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)