Revision as of 09:03, 19 September 2007 editRucasHost (talk | contribs)2,092 edits Undid revision 158912039 by EllenFoster (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:31, 21 September 2007 edit undoLord Loxley (talk | contribs)869 edits →Caveat on James: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box | auto=yes}} | {{archive box | auto=yes}} | ||
== Caveat on James == | |||
If you look at the King's talk page, you will notice how Christians are blasted like there's no tomorrow, while gay conspiracy theorists are lauded, a plainly self-promotional editorial approach by the queer POV brigade. You should really look at ], which I added significantly to by creating the section '''Inconsistencies in theory'''. ] 16:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:31, 21 September 2007
Archives |
Caveat on James
If you look at the King's talk page, you will notice how Christians are blasted like there's no tomorrow, while gay conspiracy theorists are lauded, a plainly self-promotional editorial approach by the queer POV brigade. You should really look at Personal relationships of James I of England, which I added significantly to by creating the section Inconsistencies in theory. Lord Loxley 16:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)