Misplaced Pages

Talk:Demonoid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:11, 25 September 2007 edit140.192.131.194 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 14:15, 25 September 2007 edit undoDiscospinster (talk | contribs)Administrators466,213 editsm Reverted edits by 140.192.131.194 to last version by Phil UrichNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Like I said:
''No, the bittorrent tracker is . The band is practically unknown.''

And it's a 2 way disambig, which are usually disambigued with the "This article is about the BitTorrent tracker. For the metal band, see Demonoid (band)" tag. And in this case when there's such a ridiculous margin of notability, demonoid clearly should not be a 2 entry disambiguation page but rather be the actual page for the tracker.

I just made this a REDIRECT to preserve the edit history, I'll let the admins merge and mop up, etc. ] should be moved to ]. --]<sup>]</sup> 02:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

This page is more active than the other page ]. Do you think that this should be named Demonoid or should there be a disambiguation? <big><span style="border: 3px solid">]]</span></big> 23:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

unambiguously disambiguousely disambiguous... probably. ] 12:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Does this article really need that enormous image of the entire demonoid.com home page? It seems a little ridiculous ] 01:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

== Please ==

see ] re naming issues --]<sup>]</sup> 02:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Like I said: Like I said:
''No, the bittorrent tracker is . The band is practically unknown.'' ''No, the bittorrent tracker is . The band is practically unknown.''
Line 34: Line 18:
== Quality == == Quality ==


Perhaps the quality of demonoid's torrents should be noted here. I've heard that their <s>albums</s> gay porn is mislabeled; in the best case being all lowercase letters, in the worst, poorly spelled and misdated and with no cumshot. Anything? I am horny for a cock in my ass Perhaps the quality of demonoid's torrents should be noted here. I've heard that their albums are mislabeled, in the best case being all lowercase letters, in the worst, poorly spelled and misdated. Anything? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

<small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Haha, obviously you're either terribly misled or willyfully misleading. People often even post FLAC copies with .cue files and all, can't get much more complete than that. Maybe you're just self-righteously attacking piracy, and there are arguments to be made there sure, but you're not exactly helping your cause with blatantly false accusations. Then again, I guess I only download GOOD music. Maybe if you're downloading the new Simple Plan album the 9-year-old that posted it didn't tag it properly, I dunno. ] 04:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC) :Haha, obviously you're either terribly misled or willyfully misleading. People often even post FLAC copies with .cue files and all, can't get much more complete than that. Maybe you're just self-righteously attacking piracy, and there are arguments to be made there sure, but you're not exactly helping your cause with blatantly false accusations. Then again, I guess I only download GOOD music. Maybe if you're downloading the new Simple Plan album the 9-year-old that posted it didn't tag it properly, I dunno. ] 04:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:15, 25 September 2007

Like I said: No, the bittorrent tracker is one of the most visited sites on the entire internet. The band is practically unknown.

And it's a 2 way disambig, which are usually disambigued with the "This article is about the BitTorrent tracker. For the metal band, see Demonoid (band)" tag. And in this case when there's such a ridiculous margin of notability, demonoid clearly should not be a 2 entry disambiguation page but rather be the actual page for the tracker.

I just made this a REDIRECT to preserve the edit history, I'll let the admins merge and mop up, etc. Demonoid (BitTorrent) should be moved to Demonoid. --froth 02:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

This page is more active than the other page demonoid. Do you think that this should be named Demonoid or should there be a disambiguation?  Xeysz  ☼  23:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

unambiguously disambiguousely disambiguous... probably. Cowicide 12:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Does this article really need that enormous image of the entire demonoid.com home page? It seems a little ridiculous dystopianray 01:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Please

see Talk:Demonoid re naming issues --froth 02:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality

Perhaps the quality of demonoid's torrents should be noted here. I've heard that their albums are mislabeled, in the best case being all lowercase letters, in the worst, poorly spelled and misdated. Anything? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.100.218.156 (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Haha, obviously you're either terribly misled or willyfully misleading. People often even post FLAC copies with .cue files and all, can't get much more complete than that. Maybe you're just self-righteously attacking piracy, and there are arguments to be made there sure, but you're not exactly helping your cause with blatantly false accusations. Then again, I guess I only download GOOD music. Maybe if you're downloading the new Simple Plan album the 9-year-old that posted it didn't tag it properly, I dunno. Phil Urich 04:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Demonoid: Difference between revisions Add topic