Revision as of 11:54, 26 September 2007 editJLaTondre (talk | contribs)Administrators45,016 edits →Copyright Violations: both incorrect← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:59, 27 September 2007 edit undoOrangemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators126,254 edits →Copyright Violations: Thanks for checking the factsNext edit → | ||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
::Your interpretation is correct. Information from a US public school website written by a school employee is public domain in America. ➪]! 02:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | ::Your interpretation is correct. Information from a US public school website written by a school employee is public domain in America. ➪]! 02:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::*You are both incorrect. Only US Federal publications are automatically public domain under US copyright law. The federal exemption does not apply to state or local government works. Certain state governments have chosen to release their materials as public domain, but this is a state by state choice and not all states do so. Local governments are an additional layer of complexity. In this case, it is a local government website and that website has a copyright notice. --] 11:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | :::*You are both incorrect. Only US Federal publications are automatically public domain under US copyright law. The federal exemption does not apply to state or local government works. Certain state governments have chosen to release their materials as public domain, but this is a state by state choice and not all states do so. Local governments are an additional layer of complexity. In this case, it is a local government website and that website has a copyright notice. --] 11:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::You are correct! Thanks for the fact-checking, JLaT. --] 03:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Present == | == Present == |
Revision as of 03:59, 27 September 2007
Warning to Vandals: This user is equipped with Lupin's Anti-vandal tool. |
This user reverts vandalism in the blink of an eye with Twinkle! |
Say what's on your mind!Click here to leave me a message I will reply on this page unless you request otherwise. Hi!-- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Welcome to WikiProject LGBT studies!
Welcome to the Article Rescue SquadronGreetings and welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! Please browse Articles for Deletion periodically, and help fix any articles flagged for rescue that you can. If you have any questions please let me know. Fosnez 02:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Crocker date or place of birth, Please StopYour edits although well-intentioned to the Chris Crocker article are a blatant violation of Do No Harm policy. Please read up on WP:Bio. The subject of the article has received death threats and has worked to retain a level of anonymity. Your addition of date/place of birth can risk their safety as well as anyone perceived to be them. Benjiboi 12:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Ed FordhamHi, ASE! Regarding Ed Fordham, I'm pretty sure someone's blog isn't considered a reliable source. Furthermore, the blog says that he wants to remain closeted. So unless we can find a good source, we should probably remove that reference and the LGBT cat/info. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 14:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Re:Patricia SoltysikWho defines SLA as a terrorist organization? It was more of an anarchist organization, if anything. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 14:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Patricia Soltysik not a person?Now why do you keep removing the bio tag? -- Esemono 14:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Nice signitureIt reminds me of mine! Yes, this is random, but I just had to say it.. THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 11:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Nicely done!Thanks for the two B's you did on our list - nicely done :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 13:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
That last Donna Ladd edit... seems to say she's drawing condemnation from her biggest fans...? (It also seems to be verging on a NPOV violation, with strong unsourced implications of hypocrisy.) --Orange Mike 20:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
September 11, 2001 attacks in popular cultureHello, I am the editor who created an afd for the above article. I notice that you have closed it, however, discussion for it was just barely getting started. I think you have closed it, rather early. It would be nice to hear from the larger community. I don't feel merging is the answer. These popular culture listing get extremely lengthy, and it is difficult to source each one of them. Please consider opening it again. Fighting for Justice 06:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
WarningsPlease don't revert without leaving the vandal a message. Reverting is not as important as letting the user know he was reverted for vandalizing. — Moe ε 14:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Why did you revert Best Revenge edits?You didn't leave any reason for reverting the additional information and picture that I added to the Best Revenge article this morning. What gives? - Mackaye 9:57 September 25, 2007 (PST)
Copyright ViolationsMisplaced Pages takes copyright seriously. Please do not post copyrighted text. Also, please do not remove copyvio tags from articles without fixing the problems as you did here and here. I have removed the text that was a direct copy from these two articles. If you wish to rewrite the content in your own words, you are welcome to do so. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 22:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
PresentI'm pretty sure the copyright for the picture does not let me do this, but here ya go :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Great work!
|