Revision as of 03:13, 22 October 2003 editJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators144,201 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:21, 22 October 2003 edit undoJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators144,201 edits more chronological rearrangement, some more details addedNext edit → | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Meanwhile the Croat kings exacted tribute from the Italian cities, ], Zara and others, and consolidated their own power in the purely Slavonic towns, such as Nona (Nin) or Zaravecchia (Biograd na moru). | Meanwhile the Croat kings exacted tribute from the Italian cities, ], Zara and others, and consolidated their own power in the purely Slavonic towns, such as Nona (Nin) or Zaravecchia (Biograd na moru). | ||
The Christian schism was an important factor in the history of Dalmatia. While the Slav |
The Christian schism was an important factor in the history of Dalmatia. While the Slav church of Nona (Nin) was under Papal jurisdiction, they still used the Slav liturgy, but the Italic population of the cities preferred the Latin liturgy, as did the Holy See. The great schism between Eastern and Western Christianity of ] further intensified the rift between the coastal cities and the hinterland, with many of the Slavs in the hinterland preferring the Orthodox (or sometimes the ]). The Latin influence was increased and the Byzantine practices were further suppressed on the general synods of ]-], ], ]-] and others local synods, notably by demoting the bishopric of Nona, installing the archbishoprics of Spalato and Dioclea, and explicitely forbidding use of any liturgy other than Greek or Latin. | ||
Dalmatia never attained a political or racial unity and never formed as a ], but it achieved a remarkable development of art, science and literature. The lands in the northeast such as ], ] and ] had each its period of national greatness, but the Dalmatian city-states, often isolated and compelled to look to Italy for support, shared perforce in the march of Italian civilization. | Dalmatia never attained a political or racial unity and never formed as a ], but it achieved a remarkable development of art, science and literature. The lands in the northeast such as ], ] and ] had each its period of national greatness, but the Dalmatian city-states, often isolated and compelled to look to Italy for support, shared perforce in the march of Italian civilization. | ||
The once rival Italic and Slavic races eventually started contributing to a common civilization, evidenced in the literature of Ragusa (called Dubrovnik by the Slavs) of the ]. | The once rival Italic and Slavic races eventually started contributing to a common civilization, evidenced in the mixed councilmen names in the ] and the literature of Ragusa (called Dubrovnik by the Slavs) of the ]. | ||
The geographical position of the Dalmatian city states suffices to explain the relatively small influence exercised by Byzantine culture throughout the six centuries (]-]) during which Dalmatia was part of the ]. Towards the close of this period Byzantine rule tended more and more to become merely nominal. | The geographical position of the Dalmatian city states suffices to explain the relatively small influence exercised by Byzantine culture throughout the six centuries (]-]) during which Dalmatia was part of the ]. Towards the close of this period Byzantine rule tended more and more to become merely nominal. | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
These rights and the analogous privileges granted by Venice were, however, too frequently infringed. Hungarian garrisons were being quartered on unwilling towns, while Venice interfered with trade, the appointment of bishops, or the tenure of communal domains. Consequently the Dalmatians remained loyal only while it suited their interests, and insurrections frequently occurred. Even in Zara four outbreaks are recorded between ] and ], although Zara was treated with special consideration by its Venetian masters, who regarded its possession as essential to their maritime ascendancy. | These rights and the analogous privileges granted by Venice were, however, too frequently infringed. Hungarian garrisons were being quartered on unwilling towns, while Venice interfered with trade, the appointment of bishops, or the tenure of communal domains. Consequently the Dalmatians remained loyal only while it suited their interests, and insurrections frequently occurred. Even in Zara four outbreaks are recorded between ] and ], although Zara was treated with special consideration by its Venetian masters, who regarded its possession as essential to their maritime ascendancy. | ||
The doubtful allegiance of the Dalmatians tended to protract the struggle between Venice and Hungary, which was further complicated by internal discord due largely to the spread of the ]; and by many outside influences, such as the vague suzerainty still enjoyed by the ] during the ]; the assistance rendered to Venice by the armies of the ] in ]; and the ] invasion of Dalmatia forty years later. | |||
The doubtful allegiance of the Dal | |||
The Slavs were no longer regarded as a hostile people, in fact the power of certain Croatian magnates, notably the counts of Bribir, was from time to time supreme in the northern districts. Stephen Tvrtko, the founder of the Bosnian kingdom, was able in ] to annex the whole Adriatic littoral between Cattaro (]) and Fiume (]), except Venetian Zara and his own independent ally, Ragusa. | |||
Finally, the rapid decline of Bosnia, and of Hungary itself when assailed by the Turks, rendered easy the success of Venice; and in ] the whole of Dalmatia either submitted or was conquered, except for Almissa (Omiš) which yielded in ], and Ragusa which preserved its freedom. Many cities welcomed the change with its promise of tranquillity. | |||
=== Venetian and Turkish Rule, 1420-1797 === | |||
An interval of peace ensued, but meanwhile the Turkish advance continued. ] fell in ], ] in ], ] in ], and ] in ]. Thus the Venetian and Ottoman frontiers met and border wars were incessant. Ragusa sought safety in friendship with the invaders, and in one particular instance, actually sold two small strips of its territory (Neum and Sutorina) to the Ottomans in order to prevent land access from the Venetian territory. | |||
In ] the hostile league of Cambrai compelled Venice to withdraw its garrison for home service, and after the overthrow of Hungary in ] the Turks were able easily to conquer the greater part of Dalmatia. The peace of ] left only the maritime cities to Venice, the interior forming a Turkish province, governed from the fortress of Clissa (Klis) by a Sanjakbeg, or administrator with military powers. | |||
Christian Slavs from the neighbouring lands now thronged to the towns, outnumbering the Italian population and introducing their own language, but falling under the influence of the ]. The pirate community of the Uskoks had originally been a band of these fugitives; its exploits contributed to a renewal of war between Venice and Turkey (1571-1573). An extremely curious picture of contemporary manners is presented by the Venetian agents, whose reports on this war resemble some knightly chronicle of the middle ages, full of single combats, tournaments and other chivalrous adventures. They also show clearly that the Dalmatian levies far surpassed the Italian mercenaries in skill and courage. Many of these troops served abroad; at the ], for example, in ], a Dalmatian squadron assisted the allied fleets of Spain, Venice, Austria and the Papal States to crush the Turkish navy. | |||
A fresh war broke out in ], lasting intermittently until ], when the ] gave the whole of Dalmatia to Venice, including the coast of Herzegovina, but excluding the domains of Ragusa and the protecting band of Ottoman territory which surrounded them. After further fighting this delimitation was confirmed in ] by the ]. | |||
=== Dalmatia after 1797 === | |||
After the fall of the Venetian republic in ], the treaty of Campo Formio gave Dalmatia to Austria. The republics of Ragusa and Poglizza (Poljica) retained their independence, and Ragusa grew rich by its neutrality during the earlier Napoleonic wars. | |||
By the peace of Pressburg in ], Istria, Dalmatia and the Bay of Kotor were handed over to ] as the so-called Illyrian provinces. In ], the Ragusan Republic finally succumbed to foreign (French) troops, the same year a ] force tried to contest the French by seizing Bocche di Cattaro (]). The Russians induced the ] to render aid and they proceeded to take the island of Curzola (Korčula) but made no further progress. Ragusa was officially annexed to the Illyrian Provinces in ]. | |||
Austria-Hungary declared war on France in ], restored control over Dalmatia by ] and formed a temporary Kingdom of Illyria. In ], this was eliminated and Dalmatia was placed under Austrian administration. Since the ], the Croats from Dalmatia advocated a union with the Croats from Croatia, which were under Hungarian administration. The Italic population in the cities on the other hand advocated a union with the emerging ]. This political conflict remained unsolved until the ] and the disintegration of ]. | |||
Under the ] of ], Italy was to attain the northern Dalmatia (and cities of Zadar, Šibenik and Knin), but it occupied even more of it. After the war, Dalmatia became part of the ] and after negotiations, only Zadar and the island of Lastovo remained part of ]. After the ], both of those territories were added to the ], in particular the republic of Croatia. In ], Dalmatia became part of independent Croatia. | |||
==See also== | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (the dog) | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | |||
* This article incorporates text from the public domain '']''. Please update ]. | |||
* |
Revision as of 03:21, 22 October 2003
Dalmatia (Italian Dalmazia, Serbo-Croatian Dalmacija/Далмација) is a region of Croatia on the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, spreading between the island of Pag in the northwest and the Bay of Kotor in the southeast. The inner Dalmatia (Dalmatinska Zagora) stretches from up to fifty few kilometers inland in the north to just a few kilometers in the south.
Dalmatia is currently composed of four counties, capital cities of which are Zadar, Šibenik, Split and Dubrovnik.
The larger Dalmatian islands are Dugi otok, Ugljan, Pašman, Brač, Hvar, Korčula, Vis, Lastovo and Mljet. The larger Dalmatian mountains are Dinara, Mosor, Kozjak and Biokovo. The rivers are Zrmanja, Krka, Cetina and Neretva.
Due to the way sea currents flow and how the winds blow on the Adriatic, the sea water is much cleaner and much warmer than it is on the Italian side. This, along with the immense number of coves, islands and channels, makes Dalmatia a really attractive place for nautical races, and nautical tourism in general. There's a fair number of marinas there, of course.
Dalmatia also includes several national parks that are tourist attractions in their own right: Paklenica karst river, Kornati archipelago, Krka river rapids and Mljet island within island.
History
Illyria and the Roman Empire
The history of Dalmatia began when the tribe from which the country derives its name declared itself independent of Gentius, the Illyrian king, and established a republic. Its capital was Delminium; its territory stretched northwards from the river Narenta (Neretva) to the river Cetina, and later to the Kerka (Krka), where it met the confines of Liburnia.
The Roman Empire started the occupation of Illyria in year 168 B.C., forming the province Illyricum. In 156 B.C. the Dalmatians were for the first time attacked by a Roman army and compelled to pay tribute. In AD 10, during the reign of Augustus, Illyricum was split into Pannonia in the north and Dalmatia in the south, after the last of many formidable revolts had been crushed by Tiberius in AD 9. This event was followed by total submission and a ready acceptance of the Latin civilization which overspread Illyria.
The province of Dalmatia spread inland to cover all of the Dinaric Alps and most of the eastern Adriatic coast. Its capital was in the city of Salona (Solin). Emperor Diocletian made Dalmatia famous by building a palace for himself a few kilometers south of Salona, in Aspalathos (Split). Other Dalmatian cities at the time were:
- Tarsatica (Trsat, now part of Rijeka)
- Senia (Senj)
- Vegium (Karlobag)
- Aenona (Nin)
- Iader (second-largest city of Zadar)
- Scardona (Skradin, just north of Šibenik)
- Tragurium (Trogir)
- Aequum (Čitluk near Sinj)
- Oneum (Omiš, south of Split)
- Issa (Vis)
- Pharus (Hvar)
- Corcyra (Korčula)
- Narona (tiny town of Vid near present day Metković)
- Epidaurus (Cavtat just south of Dubrovnik)
- Rhizinium (Risan)
- Acruvium (Kotor)
- Dulcigno (Ulcinj)
- Scodra (Shkodër)
- Dyrrachium (Durrës)
The collapse of the Western Empire left this region subject to Gothic rulers, Odoacer and Theodoric the Great, from 476 to 535, when it was added by Justinian to the Eastern Empire.
Italic city states and Slavic country
Following the great Slavonic migration into Illyria in the first half of the 7th century, the Dalmatian hinterland became populated by Slavic tribes such as the Serbs and Croats. The maritime city-states, however, remained powerful as they were highly civilized and able to rely on the moral if not the material support of their kinsfolk in Italy.
The native Italic population lived safely in Ragusa, Zara and other large towns, while the country districts were settled by the Slavs. The country was thus divided between two communities, frequently hostile at first.
In 806 Dalmatia was temporarily added to the Holy Roman Empire, but the cities were restored to Byzantium by the Treaty of Aachen in 812. The Saracens raided the southernmost cities in 840 and 842, but this threat was eliminated by a common Frankish-Byzantinian campaign of 871.
Since the 830s, the duchy of Croatia controlled the northern and central parts of Dalmatia, while the Serb duchies of Pagania and Zahumlje controlled the southern parts (and further inland). The Narentines of Pagania (named after the river Narenta, today's Neretva) utterly defeated a Venetian fleet dispatched against them in 887, and for more than a century exacted tribute from Venice itself. In 998 they were finally crushed by the doge Pietro Orseolo II, who assumed the title duke of Dalmatia, though without prejudice to Byzantine suzerainty. Meanwhile the Croat kings exacted tribute from the Italian cities, Trail, Zara and others, and consolidated their own power in the purely Slavonic towns, such as Nona (Nin) or Zaravecchia (Biograd na moru).
The Christian schism was an important factor in the history of Dalmatia. While the Slav church of Nona (Nin) was under Papal jurisdiction, they still used the Slav liturgy, but the Italic population of the cities preferred the Latin liturgy, as did the Holy See. The great schism between Eastern and Western Christianity of 1054 further intensified the rift between the coastal cities and the hinterland, with many of the Slavs in the hinterland preferring the Orthodox (or sometimes the Bogomil creed). The Latin influence was increased and the Byzantine practices were further suppressed on the general synods of 1059-1060, 1066, 1075-1076 and others local synods, notably by demoting the bishopric of Nona, installing the archbishoprics of Spalato and Dioclea, and explicitely forbidding use of any liturgy other than Greek or Latin.
Dalmatia never attained a political or racial unity and never formed as a nation, but it achieved a remarkable development of art, science and literature. The lands in the northeast such as Bosnia, Serbia and Bulgaria had each its period of national greatness, but the Dalmatian city-states, often isolated and compelled to look to Italy for support, shared perforce in the march of Italian civilization.
The once rival Italic and Slavic races eventually started contributing to a common civilization, evidenced in the mixed councilmen names in the 13th century and the literature of Ragusa (called Dubrovnik by the Slavs) of the 15th century.
The geographical position of the Dalmatian city states suffices to explain the relatively small influence exercised by Byzantine culture throughout the six centuries (535-1102) during which Dalmatia was part of the Eastern empire. Towards the close of this period Byzantine rule tended more and more to become merely nominal.
Rivalry of Venice & Hungary in Dalmatia, 1102-1420
As the city states gradually lost all protection by the Byzantium, being unable to unite in a defensive league hindered by their internal dissensions, they had to turn to either Venice or Hungary for support. Each of the two political factions had support within the Dalmatian city states, based mostly on economic reasons.
The Venetians, to whom the Dalmatians were already bound by language and culture, could afford to concede liberal terms as its main goal was to prevent the development of any dangerous political or commercial competitor on the eastern Adriatic. The seafaring community in Dalmatia looked to Venice as mistress of the Adriatic. In return for protection, the cities often furnished a contingent to the army or navy of their suzerain, and sometimes paid tribute either in money or in kind. Arbe (Rab), for example, annually paid ten pounds of silk or five pounds of gold to Venice.
Hungary, on the other hand, having defeated the last Croat king in 1097, laid claim on all lands under the claim of the Croatian noblemen since the treaty of 1102 and the conquest of Dalmatia in 1102-1105 by Coloman of Hungary. The farmers and the merchants who traded in the interior favoured Hungary as their most powerful neighbour on land that affirmed their municipal privileges. Subject to the royal assent they might elect their own chief magistrate, bishop and judges. Their Roman law remained valid. They were even permitted to conclude separate alliances. No alien, not even a Hungarian, could reside in a city where he was unwelcome; and the man who disliked Hungarian dominion could emigrate with all his household and property. In lieu of tribute, the revenue from customs was in some cases shared equally by the king, chief magistrate, bishop and municipality.
These rights and the analogous privileges granted by Venice were, however, too frequently infringed. Hungarian garrisons were being quartered on unwilling towns, while Venice interfered with trade, the appointment of bishops, or the tenure of communal domains. Consequently the Dalmatians remained loyal only while it suited their interests, and insurrections frequently occurred. Even in Zara four outbreaks are recorded between 1180 and 1345, although Zara was treated with special consideration by its Venetian masters, who regarded its possession as essential to their maritime ascendancy.
The doubtful allegiance of the Dalmatians tended to protract the struggle between Venice and Hungary, which was further complicated by internal discord due largely to the spread of the Bogomil heresy; and by many outside influences, such as the vague suzerainty still enjoyed by the Eastern emperors during the 12th century; the assistance rendered to Venice by the armies of the Fourth Crusade in 1202; and the Tartar invasion of Dalmatia forty years later.
The Slavs were no longer regarded as a hostile people, in fact the power of certain Croatian magnates, notably the counts of Bribir, was from time to time supreme in the northern districts. Stephen Tvrtko, the founder of the Bosnian kingdom, was able in 1389 to annex the whole Adriatic littoral between Cattaro (Kotor) and Fiume (Rijeka), except Venetian Zara and his own independent ally, Ragusa.
Finally, the rapid decline of Bosnia, and of Hungary itself when assailed by the Turks, rendered easy the success of Venice; and in 1420 the whole of Dalmatia either submitted or was conquered, except for Almissa (Omiš) which yielded in 1444, and Ragusa which preserved its freedom. Many cities welcomed the change with its promise of tranquillity.
Venetian and Turkish Rule, 1420-1797
An interval of peace ensued, but meanwhile the Turkish advance continued. Constantinople fell in 1453, Serbia in 1459, Bosnia in 1463, and Herzegovina in 1483. Thus the Venetian and Ottoman frontiers met and border wars were incessant. Ragusa sought safety in friendship with the invaders, and in one particular instance, actually sold two small strips of its territory (Neum and Sutorina) to the Ottomans in order to prevent land access from the Venetian territory.
In 1508 the hostile league of Cambrai compelled Venice to withdraw its garrison for home service, and after the overthrow of Hungary in 1526 the Turks were able easily to conquer the greater part of Dalmatia. The peace of 1540 left only the maritime cities to Venice, the interior forming a Turkish province, governed from the fortress of Clissa (Klis) by a Sanjakbeg, or administrator with military powers.
Christian Slavs from the neighbouring lands now thronged to the towns, outnumbering the Italian population and introducing their own language, but falling under the influence of the Roman Catholic Church. The pirate community of the Uskoks had originally been a band of these fugitives; its exploits contributed to a renewal of war between Venice and Turkey (1571-1573). An extremely curious picture of contemporary manners is presented by the Venetian agents, whose reports on this war resemble some knightly chronicle of the middle ages, full of single combats, tournaments and other chivalrous adventures. They also show clearly that the Dalmatian levies far surpassed the Italian mercenaries in skill and courage. Many of these troops served abroad; at the Battle of Lepanto, for example, in 1571, a Dalmatian squadron assisted the allied fleets of Spain, Venice, Austria and the Papal States to crush the Turkish navy.
A fresh war broke out in 1645, lasting intermittently until 1699, when the peace of Karlowitz gave the whole of Dalmatia to Venice, including the coast of Herzegovina, but excluding the domains of Ragusa and the protecting band of Ottoman territory which surrounded them. After further fighting this delimitation was confirmed in 1718 by the Treaty of Passarowitz.
Dalmatia after 1797
After the fall of the Venetian republic in 1797, the treaty of Campo Formio gave Dalmatia to Austria. The republics of Ragusa and Poglizza (Poljica) retained their independence, and Ragusa grew rich by its neutrality during the earlier Napoleonic wars.
By the peace of Pressburg in 1805, Istria, Dalmatia and the Bay of Kotor were handed over to France as the so-called Illyrian provinces. In 1806, the Ragusan Republic finally succumbed to foreign (French) troops, the same year a Russian force tried to contest the French by seizing Bocche di Cattaro (Boka Kotorska). The Russians induced the Montenegrins to render aid and they proceeded to take the island of Curzola (Korčula) but made no further progress. Ragusa was officially annexed to the Illyrian Provinces in 1808.
Austria-Hungary declared war on France in 1813, restored control over Dalmatia by 1815 and formed a temporary Kingdom of Illyria. In 1822, this was eliminated and Dalmatia was placed under Austrian administration. Since the 1860s, the Croats from Dalmatia advocated a union with the Croats from Croatia, which were under Hungarian administration. The Italic population in the cities on the other hand advocated a union with the emerging Kingdom of Italy. This political conflict remained unsolved until the World War I and the disintegration of Austria-Hungary.
Under the Treaty of London of 1915, Italy was to attain the northern Dalmatia (and cities of Zadar, Šibenik and Knin), but it occupied even more of it. After the war, Dalmatia became part of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and after negotiations, only Zadar and the island of Lastovo remained part of Italy. After the World War II, both of those territories were added to the socialist Yugoslavia, in particular the republic of Croatia. In 1991, Dalmatia became part of independent Croatia.
See also
- Dalmatian language
- dalmatian (the dog)
- Goran Ivanišević
References
- This article incorporates text from the public domain 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica. Please update as needed.
- The 1911 EB's article