Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:11, 5 October 2007

WWE Saturday Night's Main Event results

• Articles for deletion/WWE Saturday Night's Main Event results
• Articles for deletion/WWE Saturday Night's Main Event results (2nd nomination)

WWE Saturday Night's Main Event results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is a list of results for a non-PPV television show held occasionally throughout World Wrestling Entertainment's history. The article doesn't cite any references for match results in the article, and only lists two at the end, which is pretty bad for an article of its size. I also feel that this lacks the notability to have its own list. The Hybrid 00:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. The Hybrid 00:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• A lot of effort has gone into the article, so I am a little conflicted. Maybe merging it with the main SNME page, I could probably find more sources. TJ Spyke 00:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• "A lot of effort" is not a valid argument. Ten Pound Hammer • 00:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• KEEP - it's just like listing PPV results.--Monnitewars 00:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
  • But it isn't a PPV, so it doesn't posses the same notability. Being PPV does matter, since PPVs are used to bring storylines to a close, or to introduce some new steam to it, where as SNME is just used as an extra Raw, SD!, or ECW. It is just used to push them along like a weekly show, and weekly results murderously fail Misplaced Pages's notability policy. The Hybrid 00:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Answer me these two things: 1) Is it weekly? 2) Why all of a sudden is it up for AfD instead of when it was created 2 years ago?--Monnitewars 00:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Answer me this, if it is so notable, then why has it been unsourced for 2 years? How long it's been around is damning to your side, not helpful. If it hasn't been sourced in two years, then why should we believe that it will ever be? The Hybrid 00:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per Hybrid above. Nikki311 00:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets Wiki guidelines for when lists should be included. Renee 01:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Actually, it fails Misplaced Pages:List guideline#Lists content due to its lack of sources. The Hybrid 01:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Sometimes policy can be ignored and this is one of those tomes.--Monnitewars 03:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
  • So, you're rational for keeping it is WP:IAR? Good luck, The Hybrid 03:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Problem?--Monnitewars 04:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
      • The admins will almost never buy that. I'm just saying, The Hybrid 04:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• I dont know if i can do this or not but I support both sides, Keep and Delete. Keep because it is like a PPV event, but considering how WWE has recently taped many SNME's in one year, it should be considered almost like a weekly show (not exactly but similarly). But I choose to Delete because of WWE taping many of them in one year.--TrUcO9311 03:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep My biggest criticism of the article is its lack of sources, but I think that adding sources makes more sense than deleting the article. It doesn't seem as though the show is being produced on a frequent basis, as there are four events listed in the past two years. Eventually, this could be split between the "old" SNEM and the "new" SNME to avoid making it too long. I've found some references and added them to the first couple of events, so it should be possible to get this sourced if it ends up being kept. GaryColemanFan 07:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Nothing but cruft. No notable than any PPV article and lacks sources for specific matches. I would relate this to the deletions of "WWE Homecoming", "RAW Family Reunion", "Tribute to the Troops", etc (occasional hyped events). MITB LS 07:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. SNME has historically been on a par with PPV's, even above them at some periods. Bacchiad 12:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. It's trivial, unsourced and not that important for Misplaced Pages. As MITB stated: this is on the same level on special editions of Raw. This article should be a redirect to the main SNME article. This is a television show, and isn't as notable as pay per view events. I might just make this article on a wrestling wiki, as that's the proper place for it. RobJ1981 13:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Games or sports)
• AfD debates