Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
Line 16:
Line 15:
Please don't use edit summaries like . Misplaced Pages works much more smoothly when editors are reasonably civil to each other. ] ] 15:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Please don't use edit summaries like . Misplaced Pages works much more smoothly when editors are reasonably civil to each other. ] ] 15:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
==3RR==
*{{3RR|Chris Benoit}} -- ]<sup>]</sup> 15:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Revision as of 15:48, 5 October 2007
Image tagging for Image:Davina mccall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Davina mccall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
That paragraph was discussed at length by editors and it was agreed that it should be mentioned at the start of the article - if you disagree, I suggest you make a case on the talk page and try to change that consensus. --Fredrick day21:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Chris Benoit shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Scorpion15:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
