| Revision as of 15:58, 7 October 2007 editLar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators29,172 editsm →Results: typo on user name← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:39, 7 October 2007 edit undoExtraDry (talk | contribs)1,022 edits →ArchifileNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| And now personal attacks ] 13:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | And now personal attacks ] 13:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *Um, I have a hard time seeing that as a personal attack. The user seems to be saying that your actions are in good faith. ++]: ]/] 15:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | *Um, I have a hard time seeing that as a personal attack. The user seems to be saying that your actions are in good faith. ++]: ]/] 15:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| **It is, I will rewrite it for you "He does not give a shit what he reverts or reads because he is to busy deleting things" Deffently not good faith by him. ] 22:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : It should be noted ExtraDry has been alleging this for months (see also ]), and I'm not absolutely sure the bans which have been enacted are sound. Whatever way, the edits on ] and related articles and talk pages by both sides of this one have been inflammatory and unhelpful. I am unaware of any "community based ban or block". ] 13:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | : It should be noted ExtraDry has been alleging this for months (see also ]), and I'm not absolutely sure the bans which have been enacted are sound. Whatever way, the edits on ] and related articles and talk pages by both sides of this one have been inflammatory and unhelpful. I am unaware of any "community based ban or block". ] 13:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
| * {{unlikely}} that Castlemate or Waterdanks are related to each other or the other three. | * {{unlikely}} that Castlemate or Waterdanks are related to each other or the other three. | ||
| My advice is to let the CU part of this go, I almost rejected this whole thing on {{fishing}}... grounds. Monitor behaviour of all parties to the applicable pages, and act accordingly, but don't go witchhunting. ++]: ]/] 15:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | My advice is to let the CU part of this go, I almost rejected this whole thing on {{fishing}}... grounds. Monitor behaviour of all parties to the applicable pages, and act accordingly, but don't go witchhunting. ++]: ]/] 15:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| It's confirmed that Tallum == Archifile have a look at this diff ] 22:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:39, 7 October 2007
Archifile
Template:Checkuser requests to be listed
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 22:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Archifile (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mitchplusone (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Castlemate (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Waterdanks (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tallum (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: F & G
All users are editing articles realated to Newington College & are adding alot of Schoolcruft Archifile has had known to use sockpuppets & one of thoes has been blocked. (See Tallum) They use the accounts to make multiple keep votes in AFDs. The school has had 3 Users & 4 IPs blocked for the same thing on a separate RFCU Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Silveriver.
So to summarise Vote fraud & Evasion of community-based bans or blocks
ExtraDry 22:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
And now personal attacks ExtraDry 13:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Um, I have a hard time seeing that as a personal attack. The user seems to be saying that your actions are in good faith. ++Lar: t/c 15:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- It is, I will rewrite it for you "He does not give a shit what he reverts or reads because he is to busy deleting things" Deffently not good faith by him. ExtraDry 22:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- It should be noted ExtraDry has been alleging this for months (see also User:ExtraDry/Newington Sockpuppets), and I'm not absolutely sure the bans which have been enacted are sound. Whatever way, the edits on Newington College and related articles and talk pages by both sides of this one have been inflammatory and unhelpful. I am unaware of any "community based ban or block". Orderinchaos 13:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Results
Note that the previous case Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Silveriver which covered many of the same users came out 
Inconclusive
- somewhat
Likely (but certainly not confirmed) that Mitchplusone == Archifile 
Possible that Tallum == Archifile
Unlikely that Castlemate or Waterdanks are related to each other or the other three.
My advice is to let the CU part of this go, I almost rejected this whole thing on 
CheckUser is not for fishing... grounds. Monitor behaviour of all parties to the applicable pages, and act accordingly, but don't go witchhunting. ++Lar: t/c 15:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
It's confirmed that Tallum == Archifile have a look at this diff ExtraDry 22:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)