| Revision as of 00:05, 8 October 2003 editJtdirl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,275 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:47, 8 October 2003 edit undoKhranus (talk | contribs)529 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Did you forget to take your tablets today? ] 00:05, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC) | Did you forget to take your tablets today? ] 00:05, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC) | ||
| Hahahaha... Wow, you can make immature jokes and be closed-minded... I'm so impressed... | |||
| Just pick up one of his books, and read the sections on history and politics, ignoring it whenever he mentions reptilians (since that's the hardest part of his research to accept--furthest out of our normal reality tunnels). You'll find that he makes a lot of accurate references... In fact, historically, his notions that Jesus probably didn't exist and that the World Trade Centre was done by the CIA are very well backed-up. It's the same thing I do when I read literature from religious scholars. Every time they mention some silly mythical being like 'God' (in the Christian sense) I ignore that bit and continue on, gathering what in the text I find intriguing and plausible... If you're religious and you make fun of Icke, it's almost hilariously hypocritical, considering that the fantastic assumptions made to believe in those myths as reality far transcend the 'weirdness' of Icke's claims... How in the name of God can you believe that demons from a place called 'hell' are behind all the world's evil, and deny the possibility that a more tangible creature like a reptiloid extraterrestrial might have had a bit more of an influence than 'the devil'? | |||
| Even from a Christian standpoint, if you were to accept the information provided in that enormously 'weird' book, couldn't the 'demons' constantly spoken of be explicable as a race of reptilian beings? ] | |||
Revision as of 00:47, 8 October 2003
However strange Icke's views are, they deserve more credit than they get. They are very far outside of regular, especially larval human reality tunnels.
He does require a stretch of the imagination every once in a while, but his historical analysis of the Royal Family of England, the Christian religion, etc. is very well supported. Even many of his 'reptilian' claims have large amounts of evidence to support them.
Did you forget to take your tablets today? FearÉIREANN 00:05, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Hahahaha... Wow, you can make immature jokes and be closed-minded... I'm so impressed...
Just pick up one of his books, and read the sections on history and politics, ignoring it whenever he mentions reptilians (since that's the hardest part of his research to accept--furthest out of our normal reality tunnels). You'll find that he makes a lot of accurate references... In fact, historically, his notions that Jesus probably didn't exist and that the World Trade Centre was done by the CIA are very well backed-up. It's the same thing I do when I read literature from religious scholars. Every time they mention some silly mythical being like 'God' (in the Christian sense) I ignore that bit and continue on, gathering what in the text I find intriguing and plausible... If you're religious and you make fun of Icke, it's almost hilariously hypocritical, considering that the fantastic assumptions made to believe in those myths as reality far transcend the 'weirdness' of Icke's claims... How in the name of God can you believe that demons from a place called 'hell' are behind all the world's evil, and deny the possibility that a more tangible creature like a reptiloid extraterrestrial might have had a bit more of an influence than 'the devil'?
Even from a Christian standpoint, if you were to accept the information provided in that enormously 'weird' book, couldn't the 'demons' constantly spoken of be explicable as a race of reptilian beings? Khranus