| Revision as of 11:14, 10 October 2007 editVictor falk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,988 edits →User:TJ Spyke/PPV Win Percent: '''Keep''' I don't think he means to be an article, but a resource for including those stats in other articles. Which naturally be sourced then.--~~~~← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:06, 10 October 2007 edit undoRobJ1981 (talk | contribs)32,546 edits →User:TJ Spyke/PPV Win Percent: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''No reason to keep''' Subpages are meant for testing articles that could be placed on Misplaced Pages, and I think this was TJ Spyke's intent. What I think happened is that the subject is not going to be made into an article without reliable sources. Entering what TJ Spyke has on that subpage into an article would be nothing but ], as these are facts that he put together. Keeping this is mind, while I think his intention was good, it's not going to be placed in an article any time soon. What I would also like to say is that, while it serves little to no purpose keeping it, ''it doesn't meet any criteria for deletion'', hence my !vote as 'no reason to keep'. — ] ] 18:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | *'''No reason to keep''' Subpages are meant for testing articles that could be placed on Misplaced Pages, and I think this was TJ Spyke's intent. What I think happened is that the subject is not going to be made into an article without reliable sources. Entering what TJ Spyke has on that subpage into an article would be nothing but ], as these are facts that he put together. Keeping this is mind, while I think his intention was good, it's not going to be placed in an article any time soon. What I would also like to say is that, while it serves little to no purpose keeping it, ''it doesn't meet any criteria for deletion'', hence my !vote as 'no reason to keep'. — ] ] 18:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| '''Keep''' I don't think he means to be an article, but a resource for including those stats in other articles. Which naturally be sourced then.--] 11:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | '''Keep''' I don't think he means to be an article, but a resource for including those stats in other articles. Which naturally be sourced then.--] 11:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment'''. Misplaced Pages isn't a webhost. If he has no plans to make it into an article, it shouldn't be here. ] 13:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:06, 10 October 2007
User:TJ Spyke/PPV Win Percent
AfDs for this article:- User:TJ Spyke/PPV Win Percent (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This is clearly original research with no place on Misplaced Pages. This has been in TJ's user space long enough, and he has made little attempt to make it into an article. He asked for help at the wrestling project (only after this was nominated for a second time) from what I can see. The one source on the page isn't very relevant: it's just lists of results with no percents listed whatsoever. Also, Misplaced Pages isn't a web hosting service. RobJ1981 18:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not attempting to use it as a web host. Also, I know that other articles aren't relevant to this (since i've spent a great deal of time telling others this at WP:AFD), but what about all the people who have subpages devoted to their barnstars or to tell people about themselves? At least this subpage is informative and useful. There is also nothing at WP:SUBPAGE that says this isn't allowed. TJ Spyke 22:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Would the user in question like to explain the rationale behind this page, without raising WP:WAX arguments? It seems to me like an inapropriate use of userspace, but I would like to know why he wants it kept before I make an "official" opinion. --UsaSatsui 23:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any accurate rational for deletion in the nomination. This page is meant to be an article someday, so TJ is not using Misplaced Pages as a web host, and there isn't a policy stating that he has to make it into an article in a timely manner. Rather than delete a user's pages because we don't think they are moving fast enough, we should be encouraging users to create articles in their subspace if they know it will take some time to make it into an acceptable article. Now that this has been brought to the attention of WP:PW, the subpage should expand, but even if it doesn't it should be kept because it does not meet any criteria for deletion. The Hybrid 23:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. It's still original research. I just did various searches on google and it doesn't find any reliable matches. One fan site, Misplaced Pages itself and numerous things not even related. Until sources are found (which I doubt they will be), this shouldn't be a subpage as a "possible" article for the future.RobJ1981 12:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Reply - Original research isn't a criterion for the deletion of user subpages, and the fact that its intention is to be an article someday is a ground to keep it. The Hybrid T/C 03:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- No reason to keep Subpages are meant for testing articles that could be placed on Misplaced Pages, and I think this was TJ Spyke's intent. What I think happened is that the subject is not going to be made into an article without reliable sources. Entering what TJ Spyke has on that subpage into an article would be nothing but original research, as these are facts that he put together. Keeping this is mind, while I think his intention was good, it's not going to be placed in an article any time soon. What I would also like to say is that, while it serves little to no purpose keeping it, it doesn't meet any criteria for deletion, hence my !vote as 'no reason to keep'. — Moe ε 18:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep I don't think he means to be an article, but a resource for including those stats in other articles. Which naturally be sourced then.--Victor falk 11:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Misplaced Pages isn't a webhost. If he has no plans to make it into an article, it shouldn't be here. RobJ1981 13:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)