| Revision as of 00:28, 11 October 2007 view sourceBobo192 (talk | contribs)Administrators116,300 editsm Reverted edits by 68.45.218.162 (talk) to last version by Mike4ty4← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:16, 12 October 2007 view source 66.131.64.232 (talk) ←Replaced page with 'you guys sucks'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| you guys sucks | |||
| {{selfref|] redirects here. You may also be looking for ], ], ] or ].}} | |||
| {{policy|]}} | |||
| {{dispute-resolution}} | |||
| Try to avoid arguments. When this is not possible, try talking privately to those involved, or take a deep breath and sleep on it. | |||
| == Avoidance == | |||
| ''The best way to resolve a dispute is to avoid it in the first place.'' | |||
| Be respectful to others and their points of view. This means primarily: Try not to simply revert changes in a dispute. When someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, improve the edit if you can, rather than reverting it, or if you do not see it as improvable, discuss it on the talk page. ]. Provide a good ] when making significant changes that other users might object to. The revision you would prefer will not be established by reverting, and ] is forbidden; discuss disputed changes on the talk page. If you encounter rude or inappropriate behavior, resist the temptation to respond unkindly, and ]. | |||
| Writing according to the "]" and following the ] policy can help you write "defensively", and limit your own bias in your writing. For some guidelines, see ]. | |||
| == First step: Talk to the other parties involved == | |||
| The first resort in resolving almost any conflict is to discuss the issue on a ], you may even post the proposed content on the talk page. Either contact the other party on that user's talk page, or use the talk page associated with the article in question. Never carry on a dispute on the article page itself. When discussing an issue, ] and ]. Take the other person's perspective into account and try to reach a compromise. Assume that the other person is acting in ] unless you have clear evidence to the contrary. | |||
| Both at this stage and throughout the dispute resolution process, talking to other parties is not simply a formality to be satisfied before moving on to the next forum. Failure to pursue discussion in good faith shows that you are trying to escalate the dispute instead of resolving it. This will make people less sympathetic to your position and may prevent you from effectively using later stages in dispute resolution. In contrast, sustained discussion and serious ] between the parties, even if not immediately successful, shows that you are interested in finding a solution that fits within Misplaced Pages policies. | |||
| {{see|Misplaced Pages:Negotiation}} | |||
| == Second step: Disengage for a while == | |||
| {{shortcut|WP:DISENGAGE}} | |||
| A simple solution to a dispute is to '''stop''' having it — by leaving the article and/or bringing in an outside editor. This is particularly helpful when disputing with ] as it gives them a chance to familiarize themselves with Misplaced Pages's policy and culture. Focus your contributions on another article where you can make constructive progress. Avoid going back to the page of dispute. Respond to questions about it on your user talk page and direct the questioner to take their issues to the article talk page to keep all relevant discussion in one place. | |||
| Take a long term view. In due course you will probably be able to return and carry on editing it, when the previous problems no longer exist and the editor you were in dispute with might themselves move on. In the meantime the disputed article will evolve, other editors may become interested and they will have different perspectives if the issue comes up again. | |||
| == Further dispute resolution == | |||
| If talking to the other parties involved and taking a break fails, you should try one of the following methods to resolve the dispute. Which ones you choose and in what order will depend on the nature of the dispute, and the preferences of people involved. | |||
| === Discuss with third parties === | |||
| Misplaced Pages works by building ]. To develop a consensus on a disputed topic, you may need to expose the issue to a larger audience. Options for doing this include: | |||
| *], the main avenue for general disputes | |||
| *], for disputes involving only two editors | |||
| *Asking at subject-specific ]s or ] relevant to the issue. | |||
| *], for problems with ] editors | |||
| If you have not agreed to a ] before this point, you should do so now. Continuing to escalate the conflict with competing edits is likely to aggravate the dispute. This is also important if you intend to solicit outside opinions because it allows others to consider the issue fairly without the confusion of ongoing edits. If an edit war persists and parties refuse to stop, you may ] to allow the process to move forward. | |||
| :''See also ], ], and ].'' | |||
| ===Informal mediation=== | |||
| If things are getting a bit tricky, it might be useful to ask some cool heads to look in and help out. Sometimes editors who provide third opinions or respond to requests for comments may be willing to help mediate a dispute, if it is requested. The ] can also assist in settling disputes without turning to formal mediation. | |||
| === Conduct a survey === | |||
| If consensus is difficult to gauge from discussion alone, consider conducting a survey of opinion to clarify the issues in the discussion. Note that a survey cannot ''generate'' consensus, but is helpful for understanding it. Similarly, if you believe that users are ignoring a consensus, a survey cannot force those users to accept your proposed consensus -- although a survey ''might'' assist users in understanding the balance of opinions and reasons for those opinions on a given dispute, it can also easily degenerate into an argument over whether a particular survey is fairly constructed or representative. See ] for reasons why discussion is necessary and superior to voting. | |||
| === Formal mediation === | |||
| ] of the dispute. ] is a voluntary process in which a neutral person works with the parties to a dispute. The mediator helps guide the parties into reaching an agreement that can be acceptable to everyone. When requesting formal mediation, be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute using the steps listed above, and that all parties to the dispute are in agreement to mediate. Mediation cannot take place if all parties are not willing to take part. | |||
| == Last resort: Arbitration== | |||
| If you have taken all other reasonable steps to resolve the dispute, and the dispute is not over the content of the article, ]. Be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute by other means. ] differs from Mediation in that the ] will consider the case and issue a decision, instead of merely assisting the parties in reaching an agreement. If the issue is decided by Arbitration, you will be expected to abide by the result. If the case involves serious user misconduct, Arbitration may result in a number of serious consequences up to totally banning someone from editing, as laid out in the ]. | |||
| {{see|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy|Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration}} | |||
| ==Editor assistance== | |||
| ] helps editors find someone experienced to provide you one-on-one advice and feedback. While not a required part of dispute resolution, it is designed to help you understand how to clearly and civilly express your views and work toward consensus. You may request an assistant's help at any time, whether you're involved in dispute resolution or not. Assistants can also help you find the best way to resolve your dispute or issue. | |||
| == Use Version Summary == | |||
| If you don't have enough time and energy to settle disputes, you can always mark your version using the ] in such a way that you and others can find your point of view quickly among all the versions in the history column. | |||
| ==See also == | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 18:16, 12 October 2007
you guys sucks