User talk:HighInBC/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

< User talk:HighInBC Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:39, 14 October 2007 editJeffpw (talk \| contribs)9,574 editsm →Further civility issues: damn typo← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:43, 14 October 2007 edit undoHighInBC (talk \| contribs)Administrators41,786 edits →Further civility issues Next edit →
Line 56:		Line 56:
	::I thought that after our collaboration on the ] article, you would be interested in taking action. Perhaps a protocol should be developed making such users aware of the fact that slurs of that nature, especially in the context of historical pederasty, are homophobic. Anyway, he seems to have dropped out, so the whole thing may be moot. Regards, ] 03:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)		::I thought that after our collaboration on the ] article, you would be interested in taking action. Perhaps a protocol should be developed making such users aware of the fact that slurs of that nature, especially in the context of historical pederasty, are homophobic. Anyway, he seems to have dropped out, so the whole thing may be moot. Regards, ] 03:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
	:I'm disappointed that you did not look more deeply at the offending editor's contributions, Until(1==2). Had you done so, you might have seen , in which he accuses Haiduc openly of being a NAMBLA member. ], but my personal feeling is that administrative action is required, not the least being the complete expunging of that NAMBLA accusation from the Misplaced Pages record through oversight. ] 05:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)		:I'm disappointed that you did not look more deeply at the offending editor's contributions, Until(1==2). Had you done so, you might have seen , in which he accuses Haiduc openly of being a NAMBLA member. ], but my personal feeling is that administrative action is required, not the least being the complete expunging of that NAMBLA accusation from the Misplaced Pages record through oversight. ] 05:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

			::I have a life outside Misplaced Pages and I cannot drop everything every time someone wants an admin. There are noticeboards for this type of thing. You don't need an admin to make a warning, and if more action is needed go to a noticeboard. If I have disappointed you perhaps it may be because you have unrealistic expectations. ] 05:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:43, 14 October 2007

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. Carbon Monoxide 01:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Wow, I just noticed this. Did you know that I created a request about this a while back? Or was this just coincidence? Ariel♥Gold 22:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Total coincidence. 1 != 2 23:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

GMTA? lol. Well, either way, you rock for doing it, I was planning on going through the category by hand, lol. Ariel♥Gold 00:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Email 4 you

Enjoy! :) ~Eliz81 17:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Are you watching my talk page?

Just to see who is watching my talk page and willing to admit it, for your enjoyment here is my new signature. 1 != 2 05:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I refuse to admit it! I am here by coincidence! ~Eliz81 06:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I guess this is like a roll-call... I like the new sig! Nice and clean. -- Flyguy649 _contribs 06:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

This kinda makes me think I should clean my watchlist... but yeah, this is on it :) SamBC(talk) 07:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

You asked, I answered. Jeffpw 07:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I watch. I observe. I take notes. I plan. Ominously, Into The Fray /C 10:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I ~~stalk~~ er, watch your talk page! I freely admit it, lol. I have learned a ton from you by observing! (And hey, thanks for that, lol) I love the new sig! (Even though I still don't understand it, lol) Ariel♥Gold 11:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I took it off my watchlist a while ago :) I liked your old sig better, though, it had a talk link and it looked more abstract. By the way, doesn't != mean "is not" in programming language? Melsaran (talk) 19:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

It means "not equal", 1 does not equal 2. 1 != 2 22:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Hrmm, I'm going to have to agree I liked the link to the talk page in the signature, but I can understand if you're trying to make it shorter in the edit box, not to have it there. Ariel♥Gold 22:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Just an idea... You could link the 1 to your user page, the != to your talk page, and the 2 to your contributions, and keep the colours the same. Melsaran (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

It linked to my user page by oversight, it is better to point to my talk page, which I have changed it to do. 1 != 2 22:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't watch this page, but I saw your new sig on ANI, and wanted to say ILIKEIT. WODUP 03:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

My name is still cooler than everyone else's. So there. HalfShadow 03:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Much better than the old one. At least people who don't know you know your name now. Oh and I'm here randomly... not watching it at all... Gscshoyru 03:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I, too, saw your cool sig on ANI, and was checking out all the Admins and editors anyway. I was actually looking for your "Hall of Fame"... which Barnstars you got and whatnot, but no luck. Maybe you keep them archived someplace interesting? :) Wikisteff 08:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Further civility issues

What is your opinion of these edits? Haiduc 23:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

That is a history page, I don't know which edits you are referring to. 1 != 2 23:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

It was not so much a matter of Greek history that I was pointing out. I thought you might notice the comments of the user who posted the edits of Sept. 2nd. Haiduc 00:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you give the person a civility warning. 1 != 2 02:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I thought that after our collaboration on the Historical pederastic couples article, you would be interested in taking action. Perhaps a protocol should be developed making such users aware of the fact that slurs of that nature, especially in the context of historical pederasty, are homophobic. Anyway, he seems to have dropped out, so the whole thing may be moot. Regards, Haiduc 03:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm disappointed that you did not look more deeply at the offending editor's contributions, Until(1==2). Had you done so, you might have seen this libelous edit, in which he accuses Haiduc openly of being a NAMBLA member. I have warned him, but my personal feeling is that administrative action is required, not the least being the complete expunging of that NAMBLA accusation from the Misplaced Pages record through oversight. Jeffpw 05:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I have a life outside Misplaced Pages and I cannot drop everything every time someone wants an admin. There are noticeboards for this type of thing. You don't need an admin to make a warning, and if more action is needed go to a noticeboard. If I have disappointed you perhaps it may be because you have unrealistic expectations. 1 != 2 05:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)