| Revision as of 03:49, 16 October 2007 edit Polounit (talk | contribs)130 edits Greenwinged, Derek, Turtlescrubber, BobbleheadNext edit → |
| (No difference) |
Revision as of 03:49, 16 October 2007
Greenwinged
Template:Checkuser requests to be listed
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 03:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Greenwinged (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bobblehead (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Turtlescrubber (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dereks1x (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- F: Ban evasion by Dereks1x .
Greenwinged is a sock of banned user Dereks1x (according to Turtlescrubber ). This accusation should be proven or it's incivility (given the harsh tone of the accusation).
Turtlescruber and Bobblehead are the two main people on that talk page to scream about Derek socks. Are they singing as imaginary friends? I accuse them not while waiting for some checkuser evidence, which will also find out if either of the two (or one) is creating sock Greenwinged so that they can look like phony sockpuppet fighters. The evidence for that is neither requested a checkuser but are so quick to call Greenwinged a sock (which could be because they created the sock themselves?)
I have purposely posed the above question here to keep it low keyed instead of screaming on talk pages "Sock!" or on WP:ANI or elsewhere cuz I know from personal experience that a false accusation of being a sock can make a good editor (like me) stop contributing even after being unblocked. Administrator Walton made such observation. Polounit 03:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)