Revision as of 06:33, 18 October 2007 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,204 editsm Signing comment by 71.102.100.188 - ""← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:54, 18 October 2007 edit undoEvrik (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers88,476 edits {{WikiProject California|class=stub}}Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject California|class=stub}} | |||
==ambiguous=== | |||
:''Linus Torvalds has by now left Transmeta to dedicate himself to the further development of the Linux Kernel.'' | :''Linus Torvalds has by now left Transmeta to dedicate himself to the further development of the Linux Kernel.'' | ||
the above sounds a bit ambiguous - when did Torvalds actually leave Transmeta? | the above sounds a bit ambiguous - when did Torvalds actually leave Transmeta? {{unsigned|Kpjas|02:35, 16 May 2004}} | ||
==New== | |||
----- | |||
Does Transmeta publish their VLIW instruction set? | Does Transmeta publish their VLIW instruction set? How much info if publicly available? As I understand it, currently the processors are shipped/intergrated in an x86 only configuration, right? {{unsigned|80.178.230.241|01:50, 11 October 2004}} | ||
:''Does Transmeta publish their VLIW instruction set?'' No. | |||
:''How much info if publicly available?'' It is IP. {{unsigned|Admiral tojo|22:45, 15 August 2006}} | |||
==CMS== | |||
No. | |||
⚫ | Is the Code Morphing Software (CMS) built into the microprocessor chip itself, or is it on a separate chip ? {{unsigned|DavidCary |22:56, 15 December 2004}} | ||
⚫ | :Reply: Chances are, (CMS) is going to be built into the processor to help curb bottlenecks in performance. Its probably on a type of prom chip that is part of the processors core. {{unsigned|131.216.45.125|14:47, 2 June 2005}} | ||
⚫ | ::I thought Transmeta produced yoghurt and Linus Torvalds was employed as a test taster. — ] | ] 15:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
⚫ | == Trivia statement == | ||
How much info if publicly available? | |||
⚫ | A bullet is "Can easily run Linux". The company can easily run Linux? If this is in reference to the processors, any processor can run linux as easily as any other operating system. {{unsigned|204.87.68.252|12:01, 19 June 2007}} | ||
It is IP. | |||
As I understand it, currently the processors are shipped/intergrated in an x86 only configuration, right? | |||
---- | |||
⚫ | Is the Code Morphing Software (CMS) built into the microprocessor chip itself, or is it on a separate chip ? | ||
⚫ | Reply: Chances are, (CMS) is going to be built into the processor to help curb bottlenecks in performance. Its probably on a type of prom chip that is part of the processors core. | ||
---- | |||
⚫ | I thought Transmeta produced yoghurt and Linus Torvalds was employed as a test taster. — ] | ] 15:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
==VansHardware site== | |||
The VansHardware site referenced in footnote 4 has been established as being created by a via employee. At the time the referenced article was written via and transmeta were actively competing for the same business. I think the annotated assertions based solely on that website should be removed due to objectivity. See http://www.vanshardware.com/news/2001/september/september_news.htm <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | The VansHardware site referenced in footnote 4 has been established as being created by a via employee. At the time the referenced article was written via and transmeta were actively competing for the same business. I think the annotated assertions based solely on that website should be removed due to objectivity. See http://www.vanshardware.com/news/2001/september/september_news.htm <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
⚫ | == Trivia statement == | ||
⚫ | A bullet is "Can easily run Linux". The company can easily run Linux? If this is in reference to the processors, any processor can run linux as easily as any other operating system. |
Revision as of 13:54, 18 October 2007
California Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
ambiguous=
- Linus Torvalds has by now left Transmeta to dedicate himself to the further development of the Linux Kernel.
the above sounds a bit ambiguous - when did Torvalds actually leave Transmeta? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpjas (talk • contribs) 02:35, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
New
Does Transmeta publish their VLIW instruction set? How much info if publicly available? As I understand it, currently the processors are shipped/intergrated in an x86 only configuration, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.178.230.241 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 October 2004 (UTC)
- Does Transmeta publish their VLIW instruction set? No.
- How much info if publicly available? It is IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Admiral tojo (talk • contribs) 22:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
CMS
Is the Code Morphing Software (CMS) built into the microprocessor chip itself, or is it on a separate chip ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidCary (talk • contribs) 22:56, 15 December 2004 (UTC)
- Reply: Chances are, (CMS) is going to be built into the processor to help curb bottlenecks in performance. Its probably on a type of prom chip that is part of the processors core. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.45.125 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 2 June 2005 (UTC)
- I thought Transmeta produced yoghurt and Linus Torvalds was employed as a test taster. — JIP | Talk 15:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Trivia statement
A bullet is "Can easily run Linux". The company can easily run Linux? If this is in reference to the processors, any processor can run linux as easily as any other operating system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.87.68.252 (talk • contribs) 12:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
VansHardware site
The VansHardware site referenced in footnote 4 has been established as being created by a via employee. At the time the referenced article was written via and transmeta were actively competing for the same business. I think the annotated assertions based solely on that website should be removed due to objectivity. See http://www.vanshardware.com/news/2001/september/september_news.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.100.188 (talk) 06:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Categories: