| Revision as of 19:02, 25 October 2007 editExcirial (talk | contribs)211,201 editsm →Your reversion of my reversion to Black-footed Ferret← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:06, 25 October 2007 edit undoPhilip Trueman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers105,672 edits →Your reversion of my reversion to Black-footed Ferret: reply to reply (on my talk page)Next edit → | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| Excuse me? Coolipop says they eat tigers, and I'm wrong to revert such nonsense? ] 18:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | Excuse me? Coolipop says they eat tigers, and I'm wrong to revert such nonsense? ] 18:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *Your revert got a previously vandalized line back in, saying "David is gay". Im currently reverting at high speed, so that line was enough to call it a vandalism for me :) --] 19:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | *Your revert got a previously vandalized line back in, saying "David is gay". Im currently reverting at high speed, so that line was enough to call it a vandalism for me :) --] 19:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Ah! OK, fair enough. I'd be grateful if you'd read ] though. It's only an essay, not policy, but all the same ... ] 19:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:06, 25 October 2007
Your recent edits
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ratio, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kubanczyk 06:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies for that. I was reverting a vandal edit in this page (Content replaced by swears). I have no idea what went wrong with this rollback, as the history of the page shows no vandalisation that i could have reverted. I guess i reverted an incorrect page here.
--Excirial 06:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- No problem then, happy editing. --Kubanczyk 07:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Recent change
What an idiot -rolls eyes- what kind of person vandalizes a page less than 5 minutes after they have been warned about it lmao - was about to warn him/her but I guess you get there first =)Kenjoshii 10:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC) mann I sure need a break from welcoming
Barnstar
Thank you very much! Hut 8.5 11:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For patrolling the 'pedia and cutting out the crap. James086 13:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC) |
Just a small point, it's not even important really, but on Misplaced Pages there's a difference between blocking and banning. Blocking is prevention of editing, like with vandals while banning is more serious, it means that the user is not welcome at all (they are usually blocked as well). Their edits are usually characteristic (they are interested in a particular topic) and they are persitently disruptive. Nonetheless, you have definitely earned a barnstar for your anti-vandalism. Keep it up! James086 13:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I have been patrolling for just two days, so im really honoured by already receiving this award. I understood the difference between "Banning" and "Blocking" alreay, buy i generally confuse the terms when writing them down. I tend to use "Banning" when refering to infinite blocks for users, and "Blocking" for everything else. Still, thanks for the clarification of the terms, and again a huge thanks for the barnstar, which will make its way to my user page at once :)
--Excirial 13:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I also find it easier to reply on other's talk pages but I'm flexible. Hah! You've made more edits in these past 2 days than my first few months! See you round, James086 13:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Anti vandalism
Have you looked into WP:TWINKLE? I think you'd find it very useful. --Dweller 13:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for the advice. Currently i am using Lupin, but its always worthwhile to have a look at the other tools theere are to stop the vandals around here. I will have a look at it as soon as i get home from my job :) --Excirial 13:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Aclaration
Escuse me, i did not vandalize the wikipediholism test, i only make an edit that the test itsel present as part of a question; i do not demand an apology or something i simply do not like to be called a vandal. Good day. Zidane tribal
Thanks
For reverting my userpage. Best, --Bfigura 17:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Excirial,
Check you bot please. It just tagged me for Vandalism. For the record, I removed vandalism in that article, and in fact, just now tagged it for deletion as there's nothing in there but a bunch of attack pages, one right after the other. I just removed your message on my usersite. Thanks ! KoshVorlon ".. We are ALL Kosh..." 18:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I left a reply on your own talk page. Besides, im not a bot, im manually operated :) --Excirial 18:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Your reversion of my reversion to Black-footed Ferret
Excuse me? Coolipop says they eat tigers, and I'm wrong to revert such nonsense? Philip Trueman 18:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Your revert got a previously vandalized line back in, saying "David is gay". Im currently reverting at high speed, so that line was enough to call it a vandalism for me :) --Excirial 19:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ah! OK, fair enough. I'd be grateful if you'd read WP:DTTR though. It's only an essay, not policy, but all the same ... Philip Trueman 19:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)