| Revision as of 23:30, 3 November 2007 editSlambo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators190,454 edits notified WikiProject Trains← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:38, 3 November 2007 edit undoSeresin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,029 edits →BNSF 7687Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Delete''', fails ]. ] 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', fails ]. ] 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' notification left on ]. ] <small><font color="black">]</font></small> 23:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' notification left on ]. ] <small><font color="black">]</font></small> 23:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :*Wonderful. Now we'll get floods of rail-lovers who will outnumber all comments based in policy. '''] ]''' 23:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:38, 3 November 2007
BNSF 7687
Contested prod. A non notable locomotive.
- Also including BNSF 7695 Nuttah68 16:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge and redirect to an UNLINKED list article, maybe List of BNSF locomotives. These and other non-notable locomotives could be merged to a list article per WP:LIST guidelines and Misplaced Pages:Deletion policy#Merging instructions; that is often how such items are handled. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ack. Not a notable locomotive. There's no need to redirect it. I don't see enough people searching for the term to warrant it. i (talk) 19:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, NN locomotive. Misplaced Pages is not a directory of rolling stock. There are plenty of railfan websites for this material (though I have no idea if any are wikis, which would be useful). --Dhartung | Talk 21:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:N. Doctorfluffy 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment notification left on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Trains. Slambo (Speak) 23:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wonderful. Now we'll get floods of rail-lovers who will outnumber all comments based in policy. i (talk) 23:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)