| Revision as of 06:36, 9 November 2007 editCharles (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,769 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:18, 9 November 2007 edit undoUpDown (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers13,350 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| I am also nominating the following related pages because she is even less notable for the same argument, minus marriage: | I am also nominating the following related pages because she is even less notable for the same argument, minus marriage: | ||
| :{{la|Princess Marie of Hanover}} | :{{la|Princess Marie of Hanover}} | ||
| ::'''Keep''' - Charle, I think you are now going too far with this mass deletion. I agree with the deletion of the Taylor children and similar, but this person was the daughter of a monarch. That is notable in itself. Being a Princess is of note, especially when a King's daughter. As I said, I think Charles you need to stop now. Deleting articles about the Taylors and Lascelles is fair enough. You now seem to want to delete all royals!--] 08:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:18, 9 November 2007
Princess Frederica of Hanover
- Princess Frederica of Hanover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Insignifigant princess with no individual notable information that appears outside of the articles about her parents. Indeed, all of the information essentially is about her parents or about her family, but nothing of note about her as an individual. This is a genealogical entry, in violation of WP:NOT. Her presence can be noted on the pages of her suitors and her parents and that would be sufficient. Being a princess isn't a unique position and isn't reason for inclusion in Misplaced Pages solely on that note. Charles 04:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because she is even less notable for the same argument, minus marriage:
- Princess Marie of Hanover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Keep - Charle, I think you are now going too far with this mass deletion. I agree with the deletion of the Taylor children and similar, but this person was the daughter of a monarch. That is notable in itself. Being a Princess is of note, especially when a King's daughter. As I said, I think Charles you need to stop now. Deleting articles about the Taylors and Lascelles is fair enough. You now seem to want to delete all royals!--UpDown 08:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)