Revision as of 13:51, 12 November 2007 editNawlinWiki (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators221,643 edits afd2 | Revision as of 13:56, 12 November 2007 edit undoApostolos Margaritis (talk | contribs)1,885 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|NyLon}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|NyLon}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
Appears to be a neologism for "New York and London", used in one Financial Times article. ] 13:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | Appears to be a neologism for "New York and London", used in one Financial Times article. ] 13:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
You are not really right Nawlin... See also . I didn't make up this term. There is such a thing as a "] commuter" to give you just one example. BTW I live in London so I know this term is widespread. Don't rush and delete this article just because. Can't you see it is used in the prestigious FT ? If they gave it a greenlight why erase it? The term already exists, we cannot do anything about it! BTW And there are plenty more refferences in the media ready to be added . ] 13:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:56, 12 November 2007
NyLon
Appears to be a neologism for "New York and London", used in one Financial Times article. NawlinWiki 13:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
You are not really right Nawlin... See also . I didn't make up this term. There is such a thing as a "NyLon commuter" to give you just one example. BTW I live in London so I know this term is widespread. Don't rush and delete this article just because. Can't you see it is used in the prestigious FT ? If they gave it a greenlight why erase it? The term already exists, we cannot do anything about it! BTW And there are plenty more refferences in the media ready to be added . Apostolos Margaritis 13:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Categories: