Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/NyLon: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:51, 12 November 2007 editNawlinWiki (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators221,643 edits afd2  Revision as of 13:56, 12 November 2007 edit undoApostolos Margaritis (talk | contribs)1,885 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|NyLon}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|NyLon}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Appears to be a neologism for "New York and London", used in one Financial Times article. ] 13:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Appears to be a neologism for "New York and London", used in one Financial Times article. ] 13:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)



You are not really right Nawlin... See also . I didn't make up this term. There is such a thing as a "] commuter" to give you just one example. BTW I live in London so I know this term is widespread. Don't rush and delete this article just because. Can't you see it is used in the prestigious FT ? If they gave it a greenlight why erase it? The term already exists, we cannot do anything about it! BTW And there are plenty more refferences in the media ready to be added . ] 13:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:56, 12 November 2007

NyLon

NyLon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Appears to be a neologism for "New York and London", used in one Financial Times article. NawlinWiki 13:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


You are not really right Nawlin... See also . I didn't make up this term. There is such a thing as a "NyLon commuter" to give you just one example. BTW I live in London so I know this term is widespread. Don't rush and delete this article just because. Can't you see it is used in the prestigious FT ? If they gave it a greenlight why erase it? The term already exists, we cannot do anything about it! BTW And there are plenty more refferences in the media ready to be added . Apostolos Margaritis 13:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Categories: