Revision as of 03:26, 11 November 2007 editGlobeGores (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,689 edits →Format of the plot section?: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:50, 12 November 2007 edit undoJtomlin1uk (talk | contribs)4,440 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Hi, not sure if ], but does anyone think that the plot section of this article needs a bit of cleanup? It seems like it would benefit from having a less informal "storytelling" style (much as it helps attract the reader's attention). The plot summary has good information, but is suffering from containing several grammatically incorrect but stylistically okay sections (such as the fragment in the beginning). The plot section is more or less unchanged from ; the original plot summary was much shorter. Are any improvements needed? Thanks. ] (]) 03:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | Hi, not sure if ], but does anyone think that the plot section of this article needs a bit of cleanup? It seems like it would benefit from having a less informal "storytelling" style (much as it helps attract the reader's attention). The plot summary has good information, but is suffering from containing several grammatically incorrect but stylistically okay sections (such as the fragment in the beginning). The plot section is more or less unchanged from ; the original plot summary was much shorter. Are any improvements needed? Thanks. ] (]) 03:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Agreed that the present summary is not up to scratch.--] 14:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:50, 12 November 2007
Novels Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Format of the plot section?
Hi, not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but does anyone think that the plot section of this article needs a bit of cleanup? It seems like it would benefit from having a less informal "storytelling" style (much as it helps attract the reader's attention). The plot summary has good information, but is suffering from containing several grammatically incorrect but stylistically okay sections (such as the fragment in the beginning). The plot section is more or less unchanged from this edit; the original plot summary was much shorter. Are any improvements needed? Thanks. GlobeGores (talk) 03:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Agreed that the present summary is not up to scratch.--Jtomlin1uk 14:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Categories: