| Revision as of 03:13, 29 November 2007 editUserDoe (talk | contribs)3,068 edits Only warning: Vandalism on Bill O'Reilly (commentator). using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:13, 29 November 2007 edit undoSpellcast (talk | contribs)Administrators37,107 edits Blocked indefinitelyNext edit → | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| == November 2007 == | == November 2007 == | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits.<br> If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Bill O'Reilly (commentator)|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> <b><i><font color="FF3300">]</font> <font color="#99FF33">]</font></i></b><sub> ]</sub><sup>]</sup> 03:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | {{{icon|] }}}This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits.<br> If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Bill O'Reilly (commentator)|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> <b><i><font color="FF3300">]</font> <font color="#99FF33">]</font></i></b><sub> ]</sub><sup>]</sup> 03:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{reason|}}}|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|] (]) 03:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3}} -->{{{category|]}}} ] (]) 03:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:13, 29 November 2007
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
You can't wipe out Talk page content
Whoa! You cannot just wipe out Talk page content, as you did on Talk:Outfoxed (film). It stays as a permanent record of what's been discussed about the article. Wasted Time R (talk) 21:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Mackris/O'Reilly
That subsection should just be left there for now. It was an incident in O'Reilly's life that happened and not relevant to be presented as just a criticism which the spinoff article is about. If you feel strongly about moving it and make a compelling case to why this should be moved, you can propose it on the talk page and see if you can get others to agree with your reasoning. MrMurph101 (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- (+22) means how many bytes are added to the article while (-22) would mean how many bytes are being removed from the article so you can see on your watchlist if content is being added or deleted. MrMurph101 (talk) 02:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
May I suggest something?
Thanks for coming aboard and trying to help wikipedia. While it is good to be WP:BOLD, you should also show some restraint and respect the viewpoints of others. I think it would be a good idea if an experienced editor with some time could adopt you. This would be a good idea if you want to contribute positively to this encyclopedia. Thanks. MrMurph101 (talk) 05:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I would also suggest that you try getting more Misplaced Pages editing experience by working on lower-profile, less volatile subject areas. Articles about Fox News and Bill O'Reilly are among the most difficult to work in, because the nature of the subjects tends to bring more heat than light. Wasted Time R (talk) 05:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- I knew you were 16 since your user page says so. Sorry to see you leave and hopefully no one bit you too hard to drive you off. Good luck. MrMurph101 (talk) 06:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Misplaced Pages there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Croctotheface (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Words of caution
Your recent edits seem to push a particular agenda. While you may believe you are acting in good faith, and I have no doubt that you want to help improve wikipedia, new editors are encouraged to try and learn our core policies, guidelines, and mores before attempting to push their particular point of view into Misplaced Pages. Continually pushing a particular point of view is considered disruptive behavior, and should be avoided. If you need any help deciphering our myriad of guidelines and policies, please don't hesitate to ask on my talk page. Thanks! /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
3 Revert rule
Your recent editing history at Bill O'Reilly (commentator) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Bill O'Reilly (commentator), you will be blocked from editing. --Mhking (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did to Bill O'Reilly (commentator), you will be blocked from editing. User Doe ☻T 03:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Spellcast (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Category: