Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/Nrcprm2026 (4th): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:05, 5 December 2007 editFoofighter20x (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,932 editsm User:Nrcprm2026← Previous edit Revision as of 03:13, 6 December 2007 edit undoFoofighter20x (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,932 edits User:Nrcprm2026Next edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
The user seems only to have begun contributing AFTER the other accounts were banned. The user seems only to have begun contributing AFTER the other accounts were banned.

Also, just noticed this today, but the username of the accused sockpuppet is derived from one of the references listed on the page. ] (]) 03:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)





Revision as of 03:13, 6 December 2007

User:Nrcprm2026

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Nrcprm2026 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

C.Furtwangler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Foofighter20x (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Evidence

Continually reverts my edits on the page General Welfare Clause, even when content is related to the article and a well known and referenced work concerning the topic.

Also, user seems to be very adamant about continually replacing a passage concerning the Articles of Confederation in an article about a clause of the Constitution of the United States. This is objectionable due to the simple fact that the Constitution vacated and replaced the Articles; as such, the latter has no legal bearing upon the interpretation and application of the former in case law, nor any relevance to the article.

In respect to the evidence immediately above, user is adamant about replacing a passage that was authored by a proven sockpuppet and banned user (Squee23--who was banned and later returned as EthanP2, again banned and now appears to have come back as C.Furtwangler).

The user seems only to have begun contributing AFTER the other accounts were banned.

Also, just noticed this today, but the username of the accused sockpuppet is derived from one of the references listed on the page. Foofighter20x (talk) 03:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


Comments

I don't know enough about computers to look at IP adresses/logs or how to even produce such logs in order to determine if this guy is coming from the same IP prefix. The other evidence should stand to scrutiny, however, I believe. Foofighter20x (talk) 09:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Conclusions



Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Nrcprm2026 (4th): Difference between revisions Add topic