| Revision as of 13:54, 21 March 2007 editIdahoUD (talk | contribs)709 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:08, 8 December 2007 edit undoStrider12 (talk | contribs)1,243 edits →Editors needed to stifle purging of pro-life material: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Editors needed to stifle purging of pro-life material == | |||
| Hi, would you be willing to jump into the discussion page at ] -- and bring some friends. A group of editors have openly discussed "viligent" "purging" of information from peer reviewed sources which support the "controversial" idea that women who have abortions may suffer subsequent emotional problems. Though I have lots of expertise in the area, the "abortion is benign crowd and anyone who disagrees is untrustworthy" are in a revert war with me. I need more voices in there to remind them that deleting peer reviewed material goes against Wikpedia policy. I'd appreciate you adding this ] to your watch page and some periodic comments of support--] (]) 04:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)] (]) 03:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:08, 8 December 2007
Editors needed to stifle purging of pro-life material
Hi, would you be willing to jump into the discussion page at post-abortion syndrome -- and bring some friends. A group of editors have openly discussed "viligent" "purging" of information from peer reviewed sources which support the "controversial" idea that women who have abortions may suffer subsequent emotional problems. Though I have lots of expertise in the area, the "abortion is benign crowd and anyone who disagrees is untrustworthy" are in a revert war with me. I need more voices in there to remind them that deleting peer reviewed material goes against Wikpedia policy. I'd appreciate you adding this post-abortion syndrome to your watch page and some periodic comments of support--Strider12 (talk) 04:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Strider12 (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)