| Revision as of 12:50, 18 November 2003 editAdam Carr (talk | contribs)26,681 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:21, 19 November 2003 edit undoRK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users10,561 edits Post-Zionism is ''not'' synonmous with the neo-Canaanite movement.Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| This new article represents a month's co-operative editing between me and other interested users. ] 12:47, 18 Nov 2003 (UTC) | This new article represents a month's co-operative editing between me and other interested users. ] 12:47, 18 Nov 2003 (UTC) | ||
| Post-Zionism is ''not'' synonmous with the neo-Canaanite movement. This article needs to clarify the fact that the term "Post-Zionism" is still loosely defined, and can include those who consciously identify as Zionists, non-Zionists, and anti-Zionists. ] 00:21, Nov 19, 2003 (UTC) | |||
| Post-Zionism's most controversial advocates are anti-Zionists, who naturally receive a lot of press, out of proportion to their influence. It also really should be noted that the neo-Canaanite movement has little following among Israelis, or among Jews worldwide. It is only accepted among those who wish to replace the State of Israel with an Arab majority, which they euphemistically call the "state of both peoples". This state ''will'' be effectively and politically ruled by an Arab Muslim majority; all sides agree that any single-state solution will soon have an Arab Muslim majority; this is not in dispute. This context is necessary to understand why most people reject the neo-Canaanite movement. Many people have publicly criticised it as a disguised form of anti-Zionism that aims at the total removal of the State of Israel and its replacement with an Arab Palestinian State, and I have seen nothing so far to refute this position. Indeed, such views are tacitly admitted by the neo-Canaanites. ] 00:21, Nov 19, 2003 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:21, 19 November 2003
See also: Talk:Zionism/archive1, Talk:Zionism/archive2
Since this is a completely new article, I have archived the old talk.
This new article represents a month's co-operative editing between me and other interested users. Adam 12:47, 18 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Post-Zionism is not synonmous with the neo-Canaanite movement. This article needs to clarify the fact that the term "Post-Zionism" is still loosely defined, and can include those who consciously identify as Zionists, non-Zionists, and anti-Zionists. RK 00:21, Nov 19, 2003 (UTC)
Post-Zionism's most controversial advocates are anti-Zionists, who naturally receive a lot of press, out of proportion to their influence. It also really should be noted that the neo-Canaanite movement has little following among Israelis, or among Jews worldwide. It is only accepted among those who wish to replace the State of Israel with an Arab majority, which they euphemistically call the "state of both peoples". This state will be effectively and politically ruled by an Arab Muslim majority; all sides agree that any single-state solution will soon have an Arab Muslim majority; this is not in dispute. This context is necessary to understand why most people reject the neo-Canaanite movement. Many people have publicly criticised it as a disguised form of anti-Zionism that aims at the total removal of the State of Israel and its replacement with an Arab Palestinian State, and I have seen nothing so far to refute this position. Indeed, such views are tacitly admitted by the neo-Canaanites. RK 00:21, Nov 19, 2003 (UTC)