| Revision as of 22:11, 26 June 2005 editFurchild (talk | contribs)98 edits Thought about Pentium 4 security issue. | Revision as of 22:59, 26 June 2005 edit undoFurchild (talk | contribs)98 editsm Another link for Pentium 4 Hyperthreading issueNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I think this is an interesting fact that ] brought up in , so am putting it here. But I agree with ] that it's not necessarily a detail for an encyclopedia article. -- ] 22:11, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC) | I think this is an interesting fact that ] brought up in , so am putting it here. But I agree with ] that it's not necessarily a detail for an encyclopedia article. -- ] 22:11, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Oh. Another link that is more informative: . -- ] 22:59, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:59, 26 June 2005
"In 2005, security concerns were made public by Colin Percival, Cache missing for fun and profit demonstrating that malicious threads can monitor the execution of other threads."
I think this is an interesting fact that User:62.15.117.39 brought up in this revision, so am putting it here. But I agree with User:69.134.163.109 that it's not necessarily a detail for an encyclopedia article. -- Furchild 22:11, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
Oh. Another link that is more informative: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful. -- Furchild 22:59, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)