| Revision as of 14:25, 12 December 2007 editCbdorsett (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,069 edits →Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of massacres: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:56, 12 December 2007 edit undoCOGDEN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,050 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| I've replied. ] (]) 14:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | I've replied. ] (]) 14:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == NOR Request for arbitration == | |||
| Because of your participation in discussions relating to the "PSTS" model in the ] article, I am notifying you that a ] has been opened . I invite you to provide a statement encouraging the Arbcom to review this matter, so that we can settle it once and for all. ] 23:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:56, 12 December 2007
 Archives |
Berthier: Prince of Wagram
Hi. Actually if you look at the link you provided http://www.heraldica.org/topics/france/napoleon.htm#victory (and which I already knew) you find under victory title for Berthier:
Wagram for maréchal Berthier (1809, ext. 1918) Arms: Per pale: 1, Or a dexter arm proper, vested azure semy of bees or and lined of the last, holding a sword sable and on the arm a shield purpure, thereon the letter W within an orle and the motto COMMILITONI VICTOR CAESAR, all or, and a chief of duke of the Empire (Berthier); 2, Gules a on pale or three chevrons sable, and a chief of prince of the Empire (Neufchâtel).
Thus Berthier was a double prince. He had the sovereign title for Neufchâtel, awarded to him in 1806 and a victory title for the battle of Wagram, awarded in 1809. -- fdewaele, 7 December 2007, 8:56
Talk:Bosniaks
Sorry for me saying it, but aren't you beating a dead horse? --Ronz (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Bosnian Genocide
Hi, are we getting anywhere with the Mediation on the Bosnian Genocide article. It is senseless to be engaged in a tit for tat edit war with The DoB and Grandyx2 but at the same time it seems a bad option to just give up to exhaustion and stupidity and let them turn the article into a POV piece. Any other options for conflict resolution?Osli73 (talk) 01:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Please Osli73, it is time for you to behave. Remain civil when accusing other users. It is an example of personal attack. I don't mind you asking Phillip for help, alhough it is not the Misplaced Pages way. Users participating in one edit war shouldn't cooperate in another. It is bad for user's reputation, and bad for Misplaced Pages. Maybe next time you should first think before starting some redundant propaganda based articles. Regards. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 01:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Evacuation of East Prussia
So, would the article be ready for A-class review in your opinion or you have something else to change before we do this?? Best, --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 13:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of massacres
I've replied. Cbdorsett (talk) 14:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
NOR Request for arbitration
Because of your participation in discussions relating to the "PSTS" model in the No original research article, I am notifying you that a request for arbitration has been opened here. I invite you to provide a statement encouraging the Arbcom to review this matter, so that we can settle it once and for all. COGDEN 23:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)