| Revision as of 23:14, 15 December 2007 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,082 edits more← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:20, 15 December 2007 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,082 edits moreNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| Thanks for your support - the user isn't even a meatpuppet of me - ] should have requested a checkuser before abusing his admin privileges. I am going to take this to Arbcom I think. ] 23:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | Thanks for your support - the user isn't even a meatpuppet of me - ] should have requested a checkuser before abusing his admin privileges. I am going to take this to Arbcom I think. ] 23:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * See ]. Interesting, though, that you've chosen not to note any of the issues with Sfacets' behaviour identified by the nine separate admins who've blocked him for tendentious editing. Why's that? Seems to me that Andries' main aim is to pretend that Sfacets is not a disruptive POV-pusher. The block log indicates otherwise. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 23:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | * See ]. Interesting, though, that you've chosen not to note any of the issues with Sfacets' behaviour identified by the nine separate admins who've blocked him for tendentious editing. Why's that? Seems to me that Andries' main aim is to pretend that Sfacets is not a disruptive POV-pusher. The block log indicates otherwise. I'm unwatching this page, anyway. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 23:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:20, 15 December 2007
| Please leave a new message. |
(I will answer most posts on this page.)
 | Sfacets is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
/admins who have abused their privileges so far:
- Coren -
- Blocked user with half-assed excuse citing 3RR when there was none. When This was pointed out to him, fell back to "disruptive editing", when again, there was none.
- Or rather, correctly noted thet three reverts is a limit, not an entitlement.
- Extended block and banned new user because of suspicion (no evidence)
- Or rather, noted that a "brand new user" made identically POV edits to the same articles, but only while Sfactes was blocked, which is an application of the duck test.
- Guy - Multiple counts of abuse:
- Deleted newly created article complete with references and blocked it's re-creation - despite evidence that it is a notable article - deleted all attempts at communication on talkpage.
- Or rather, re-deleted an article which was created by an employee of the company, then re-created by Sfacets just to piss me off (in whihc he succeeded admirably).
- Inserted a personal attack on user's userpage
- Or rather, was trolled by Sfacets.
- Deleted, out of spite, ever single link to a domain, including a link found on a protected page.
- Or rather, responded to a spam report by removing links to a site which fails WP:RS.
- Despite having COI, and a history of harassment against this user, declined a reasonable unblock request.
- Or rather, noted that Wikilawyering about exactly how many reverts has never been a defence againsta block for disruptioive editing.
- ...
I think that Coren's blocking of uer:Yogasun was justified, because it was at best a meatpuppet of you. Andries (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support - the user isn't even a meatpuppet of me - Coren should have requested a checkuser before abusing his admin privileges. I am going to take this to Arbcom I think. Sfacets 23:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- See WP:ROUGE. Interesting, though, that you've chosen not to note any of the issues with Sfacets' behaviour identified by the nine separate admins who've blocked him for tendentious editing. Why's that? Seems to me that Andries' main aim is to pretend that Sfacets is not a disruptive POV-pusher. The block log indicates otherwise. I'm unwatching this page, anyway. Guy (Help!) 23:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)