Misplaced Pages

User talk:MARMOT: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:58, 29 June 2005 editLinuxbeak (talk | contribs)7,320 editsm Reverted edits by 62.253.96.40 to last version by Enviroknot← Previous edit Revision as of 22:12, 29 June 2005 edit undoLinuxbeak (talk | contribs)7,320 edits Blocked; complain to the mailing listNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
MARMOT has been blocked indefinetely. MARMOT, I know you're reading this. I suggest posting to the mailing list. You may sign up . ] | ] | ] June 29, 2005 22:12 (UTC)
Hi {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a ] of how the[REDACTED] works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the ]. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the ] to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a ], second, ], and third, use ]. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the ] page. You might also be interested in ] and possibly ].

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at ] if you have any questions, and you can check out the ], where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the ]. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --] <small>]</small> 15:17, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)


Thank you, I will do that.

==Protection==
I've unprotected this talk page. There's been ample precendent to say that one may edit one's user and talk pages as one sees fit. I'm quite certain there was a failed RFC on Netoholic at some point which concerned this behavior, but I can't find it at the moment (I will keep looking). If I do remember correctly, the predominant opinion was that while removing comments from one's talk page may be antisocial, it's within one's rights. I don't see what rule MARMOT has broken in removing comments from his talk page. If you desperately need to see old revisions, use the history button up top. Record diffs, if you want. But this is MARMOT's talk page, and he doesn't have to keep comments here that he doesn't want (at least as far as I'm aware). If MARMOT chooses to remove even this comment, I'd be content with his actions. - ] | ] 13:17, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

:Found it: ]. - ] | ] 13:33, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
::That is far from a consensus, and you were one of the only five people to agree that people can remove whatever they want from talk pages. That against at least five people that agreed it was not helpful. If you're going to cite some evidence that allows blanking a talk page in the middle of an RfArb against the user, you'll have to do better than that. - ] <sup><small>]</sup></small> 13:51, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

:::Well, I'm not the one making up rules. The onus of proof rests upon whoever wishes to protect this page. - ] | ] 05:43, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

== Resolution ==

We tried to be nice, but you have clearly not responded. I would rather you just relinquish this user account, and not edit from any anonymous IP's, but instead make productive contributions. Your views will be heard if you make them in anything but an offensive manner. If you make any more disruptive edits, you, and the IP's you claim, will be blocked from editing, probably indefinitely based on your history. Oh yeah, check if you have any issues with that. - ] <sup><small>]</sup></small> 17:38, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:I'll try my best, k?
::You'll have to do better than that, but fair enough. - ] <sup><small>]</sup></small> 00:27, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Ok well sorry, but you haven't tried at all . It's really not that hard to be civil and help this place out and you haven't done that. So you're blocked indefinitely. - ] <sup><small>]</sup></small> 17:09, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
:Oh, and yes, as needed, I'll block the rest of the IP's you edit from too. - ] <sup><small>]</sup></small> 17:24, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

== Liberalisation of Faggotry ==

Did you really say that the anus photo promoted "liberalisation of faggotry"? ] 20:05, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:"Thanks for that, I'd sum it up as pointless."

== Signing edits to discussion pages ==

Alright, come on, I think I've been more than fair with you. You've been asked, multiple times to sign your edits to discussion pages with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) so that it shows your username and date. If you keep up your chicanery with IP's instead, it's still the same thing. You haven't earned much patience. - ] <sup><small>]</sup></small> 22:47, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

----
Sorry for my belated response. I don't know much about the issue surrounding your block. Could you summarize the matter, as neutrally as possible? ] 23:40, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

== Email address ==
Why are you asking for my email address?] 03:57, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:12, 29 June 2005

MARMOT has been blocked indefinetely. MARMOT, I know you're reading this. I suggest posting to the mailing list. You may sign up here. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk June 29, 2005 22:12 (UTC)

User talk:MARMOT: Difference between revisions Add topic