| Revision as of 05:45, 19 December 2007 editCaribbean H.Q. (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,266 edits →Disruptive behavior: sp← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:59, 19 December 2007 edit undo66.229.248.172 (talk) →Disruptive behavior: Law suitNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ==Disruptive behavior== | ==Disruptive behavior== | ||
| Edit warring coming from this account is becoming old, your edit pattern consist mostly of undoing edits from other users if you don't like them without any attempt at discussion even if the user that reverts your addition presents a rationale for doing so. Ussually accounts that are known to belong to users that have been indefinitely blocked are blocked along the main account if their disruptive pattern persists, this is something that wasn't done to this address even if most of the contributions done by it have consisted mostly of trolling, edit warring or addition of spam promoting your website wich is obviously against what ] states. If any of the patterns mentioned above is resumed I will proceed to block this account for a minimum of three months, Misplaced Pages is a community effort, disruptive editing is a unnessesary distraction for contributive users thus a obstacle to this project's goal, on the other hand Misplaced Pages is not a platform for merchandising or promoting a certain product, if a user reverts a addition that is deemed to be spam that user is acting according to policy. Now about edit warring, before reverting or undoing someone try to actually discuss the disputed changes with the user, that way you avoid edit wars and content disputes. - ] 05:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC) | Edit warring coming from this account is becoming old, your edit pattern consist mostly of undoing edits from other users if you don't like them without any attempt at discussion even if the user that reverts your addition presents a rationale for doing so. Ussually accounts that are known to belong to users that have been indefinitely blocked are blocked along the main account if their disruptive pattern persists, this is something that wasn't done to this address even if most of the contributions done by it have consisted mostly of trolling, edit warring or addition of spam promoting your website wich is obviously against what ] states. If any of the patterns mentioned above is resumed I will proceed to block this account for a minimum of three months, Misplaced Pages is a community effort, disruptive editing is a unnessesary distraction for contributive users thus a obstacle to this project's goal, on the other hand Misplaced Pages is not a platform for merchandising or promoting a certain product, if a user reverts a addition that is deemed to be spam that user is acting according to policy. Now about edit warring, before reverting or undoing someone try to actually discuss the disputed changes with the user, that way you avoid edit wars and content disputes. - ] 05:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :we are in the process of filing a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida against this site and naming you as John Doe #1 and after we issue IP subpoenas the complaint will be amended to add your real name. We have documented this entire event for the last 3 weeks and passed it all along to our attorneys. Got $25-k to spend on legal fees get ready you will need it very soon. Check my record I dont lose lawsuits. | |||
Revision as of 05:59, 19 December 2007
 | This user seeks adoption by an experienced editor. (Users offering adoption) |
Caknuck (talk) 23:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
66.229.248.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked because a vandal kept deleting a sourced link to original articles in the New York Daily Newspaper and the Globe magazine regards details of the Menudo gay sex scandal and a link placed in the External Links section to a web site showing letters written by Menudo parents to the department of justice regards Menudo boys being sexually abused by the MGR's of Menudo also the Press release of the Department of Justice letter regards investigation of gay sex scandal involving Menudo. Surle Wiki readers should be allowed to click and read the sourced original stories for its fact and history. The deleted text was as follows. The world of Menudo came crashing down after the New York Daily News reported Gay sex abuse by the owners of Menudo NY Daily News article in addition Globe Magazine reported Gay sex and orgies were part of the group Globe Article.
Decline reason:
You were blocked for reverting the article more than three times in 24 hours. Remember to use the talk page to seek consensus for controversial edits; try dispute resolution rather than edit-warring when you disagree about content with other users. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I agree and I went to the other parties talk page but he kept undoing the sourced document links I posted. Also why has the other person not been blocked? Why just me? Will you please review the post I made and the sourced documents placed in the paragraph with PDF links to the articles. Yes they are scandalous but true sourced newspaper stories. Review and undo what the guy keeps changing and he can fight with you. Thanks for your time. www.menudo.biz
Please replace the article in the Menudo story. as follows:
The world of Menudo came crashing down after the New York Daily News reported Gay sex abuse by the owners of Menudo NY Daily News article in addition Globe Magazine reported Gay sex and orgies were part of the group Globe Article.
| This user seeks adoption by an experienced editor. (Users offering adoption) |
If you adopt me will you help get the above text that is sourced into the Menudo as someone wants this part of Menudo that was in the press unknown to your readers. The articles are original stories in PDF adobe linked.
{{unblock reviewed|1=I was blocked because a vandal kept deleting a sourced link to original articles in the New York Daily Newspaper and the Globe magazine regards details of the Menudo gay sex scandal and a link placed in the External Links section to a web site showing letters written by Menudo parents to the department of justice regards Menudo boys being sexually abused by the MGR's of Menudo also the Press release of the Department of Justice letter regards investigation of gay sex scandal involving Menudo. Surle Wiki readers should be allowed to click and read the sourced original stories for its fact and history. The deleted text was as follows. The world of Menudo came crashing down after the New York Daily News reported Gay sex abuse by the owners of Menudo NY Daily News article in addition Globe Magazine reported Gay sex and orgies were part of the group Globe Article.|
- 66.229.248.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 66.229.248.172 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Blue5864". The reason given for Blue5864's block is: "Legal threats, again".
- Blocking administrator: RyanGerbil10 (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: Based on your edits...you are Blue5864. Denied. — IrishGuy 23:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
66.229.248.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I looked at the Blue5864 talk page and he retracted the legal threats and should be unblocked and I certainly should be as I only share IP also please Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales comments on the Menudo Talk page for details of the controversy with 2 others people Jimbo said it best
Decline reason:
You aren't directly blocked. See above. — IrishGuy 23:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked from editing. Michaelbusch (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- never vandalized anything only making comments on talk pages--66.229.248.172 (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
You have continued to repost material to talk pages that adds little to the encyclopedia and seems likely to be inflammatory. You have done this despite warnings from several other editors. Please also do not pester Jimbo Wales without good reason. I suggest you read the various pages at Misplaced Pages:Getting started, since you seem to need a crash course in how Misplaced Pages editing works. Michaelbusch (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
for edit-warring and trolling. Guy (Help!) 23:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Disruptive behavior
Edit warring coming from this account is becoming old, your edit pattern consist mostly of undoing edits from other users if you don't like them without any attempt at discussion even if the user that reverts your addition presents a rationale for doing so. Ussually accounts that are known to belong to users that have been indefinitely blocked are blocked along the main account if their disruptive pattern persists, this is something that wasn't done to this address even if most of the contributions done by it have consisted mostly of trolling, edit warring or addition of spam promoting your website wich is obviously against what WP:COI states. If any of the patterns mentioned above is resumed I will proceed to block this account for a minimum of three months, Misplaced Pages is a community effort, disruptive editing is a unnessesary distraction for contributive users thus a obstacle to this project's goal, on the other hand Misplaced Pages is not a platform for merchandising or promoting a certain product, if a user reverts a addition that is deemed to be spam that user is acting according to policy. Now about edit warring, before reverting or undoing someone try to actually discuss the disputed changes with the user, that way you avoid edit wars and content disputes. - Caribbean~H.Q. 05:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- we are in the process of filing a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida against this site and naming you as John Doe #1 and after we issue IP subpoenas the complaint will be amended to add your real name. We have documented this entire event for the last 3 weeks and passed it all along to our attorneys. Got $25-k to spend on legal fees get ready you will need it very soon. Check my record I dont lose lawsuits.