| Revision as of 00:22, 15 December 2007 editShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Alexia Death/Archive Dec 2007← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:24, 23 December 2007 edit undoShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Alexia Death/Archive Dec 2007Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ===Military history Baltic states task force=== | ===Military history Baltic states task force=== | ||
| please take a look at this ] --] 18:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | please take a look at this ] --] 18:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==RE: "I cant say I will join in on the I wait you back thing"== | |||
| Are you looking to get blocked, revert warring over adding that, obviously, harassing line? Tread lightly. ] 17:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : No I'm not, I'm just being truthful AND kind, wishing all the good things for someone away. Nothing derogatory or baiting or harassing in saying what I think. Really, I do NOT appreciate the reactions, this place is going nowhere really fast if this keeps up. Relax dude. And FYI I reverted just ONCE. Would not have done even that if the one removing my remark would have not been somebody taking offense by association to a truthful expression of good will.--] 19:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are taking too much liberty with innuendo and escalating disputes, so just stop right now. ] 19:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No "little sunshine," no needing "chocolate" — limit that to your friends. You are still not trying to remain professional and matter of fact. ] 19:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Escalating!? See my post on Jerochimans page before you got involved. "Thus is life." I said. I was done with it. And now YOU are escalating it. Really do relax man. This is ridiculous.--] 19:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::This dispute, which you started for naught, and your interactions therefrom, has not been to your credit. Now, go do something else. ] 19:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Since you revert warred with me, over restoring the inflammatory "you guys could do with little sunshine in your lives," you've been blocked. ] 20:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You just cant stop cant you... I started? Thats rich, the dispute stared at some people reverting my expression of good will and others like you overreacting. BTW, I WAS doing something else before you arrived things went south thank you. And thanks for the block too. It makes very clear where you stand and what you represent, and sadly where this project is going. The Durova style at work I see. Were you part of that particular gang up list?--] 20:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Saying to someone who recently left that you're not looking forward to them coming back is taking what you call "truthful" a bit too far. You defending it, with the "chocolate," and the "sunshine" and other types innuendo, and also the support you got from someone who views said user as "a liar and a hate monger" (unsurprisingly, you found his block for that indignant insult "uncalled for"), does not paints a pretty picture. Certainly, not one that speaks of goodwill and "true" friendliness (as in, one that utilizes one's diplomatic faculties and sensitive skills, for good). Rather, it appears as slow, gradual provocations. So, again, please limit that sort of "chat" to your friends, and with everyone else (at least your opponents), remain professional, also, when they're absent and unable to respond. ] 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::What happened to ]? Did it die out of disregard while I was inactive? shesh...--] 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::What do you expect me to say to that? AGF is not a suicide pact. ] 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::PS: Where is my block notice so I can ignore it?--] 20:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'm not sure I understand your question. ] 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You are supposed to put a Block notice on my talk page so I can request for unblock. You haven't.--] 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::No, there is nothing formal set out like that. And, at the event, I have already placed a notice a few comments up. ] 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Really? I seem to remember a big template just for that...--] 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::There's {{tl|blocked}}, but it's not mandatory. As for your (irrelevant) question : no, sadly, I was not in Durova's close confidence. If I was, that incident simply would not have happened, as I knew exactly who User:!! was. ] 20:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::Oh well... I guess a girl has to provide for herself then.--] 20:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::I don't know how to read that. ] 21:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="wikitable" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! I AM BLOCKED FOR SAYING NICE THINGS TO PEOPLE | |||
| |- | |||
| | Yes, that is so. This is my sin, and then of course reverting THE WRONG PEOPLE(TM) stopping me from explaining my side. | |||
| |- | |||
| | Why I wont file for an unblock if I find this so unfair? Because a good editor ] is blocked because of me. And why is he blocked? Because the blocking admin went and harassed him until he stepped over the line and said something rather rude. I will sit this one out in solidarity with him. Aggravating situations that are just tempests in a teacup anyway is not what an admin should do. | |||
| |} | |||
| :For my part, I rather doubt you would get such a request granted, but at that is patently false, I did not harass anyone. I said: <tt>Stop trying to demoralize an inactive user (who is your content opponent) when others are attempting to the opposite, both of you.</tt> He responded with: <tt>Content opponent? No, see ]. Just a liar and hate-monger.</tt> Then I issued a 24-hr block, which an unblock-review later concurred with. But I'm evidently outliving my usefulness here. ] 21:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::The review held because of the provoked incivilities. The notice is my self expression. I do not need to show that you are biased to prove this block to be unwarranted. But i wont even try, no point. I will take it up however someday in your admin review.--] 21:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Again, I don't see how my one sentence above preceding the "incivility" (read: gross personal attack) can be seen as a provocation — i.e. implying I attempted to induce it with that single sentence certainly assumes the worse from me. You are, of course, entitled to think whatever you wish and submit any review you see fit at any time, regardless of these considerations. ] 21:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::PS: Also, having a "conversation" with people you have blocked on pages you know they cant respond is pretty low. Much lower than I expected of you.--] 21:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I am not having a conversation with anyone who is blocked; that is a comment to Jehochman and is indented accordingly. ] 21:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Yes you are. What negativity may I ask!? The source of negativity is you. And now you have driven Sander away. I will NEVER forgive you for that. EVER. You have been on this case the image of what an admin should not be and done what an admin should not do. Somebody should make a textbook case of it for future admins. Really. Fueling the fire with all your might. And you won too. Sander left in disgust. This is incredible. This project is really sinking fast... --] 21:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Of course, you say nothing about the "Hitler with adrenaline overdose" poison in his "temporarily" goodbye message. ] 21:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Sequel... == | |||
| {{tlx|unblock|The block is unjust as a single revert does not constitute revert waring. Further more he reverted my post to another users userpage into a thread that was discussing me followed by a protection of my user page. Thats gagging. I was not going to file for unblock until then, but that cannot be right. I wish for a second, uninvolved and unbiased admins opinion to this block.}} | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | {{tick|40}} | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>I agree with the user that this deserves to be discussed on AN/I. I would have lifted Sander's block yesterday but I didn't have the time. One single revert does not constitute an edit war, and God help Misplaced Pages if we decide it does. There's too much policy being made up on the fly here where it shouldn't be. After the Durova incident, this is the last thing we need to be doing. ] (]) 17:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' ] (]) 17:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||
| PS: Either when this block expires or is lifted, I will intend to take the blocking admins behavior during this incident to AN/I for wider audience asessment.--] (]) 16:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of editing restrictions == | |||
| ] '''Notice:''' Under the terms of ], any editor working on topics related to Eastern Europe, broadly defined, may be made subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he or she may be blocked for up to a week for each violation, and up to a month for each violation after the fifth. This restriction is effective on any editor following notice placed on his or her talk page. This notice is now given to you, and future violations of the provisions of this warning are subject to blocking. | |||
| Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
| ] 22:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Thank you, but this notice is not needed. I never go around intentionally insulting people. If this restriction however is going to be used as a way to keep me from stating my personal opinions on my own talk page then i am rather sorry for the project as a whole.--] (]) 00:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:24, 23 December 2007
User talk:Alexia Death/Archive1
| This is Alexia Death's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Military history Baltic states task force
please take a look at this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Baltic_states_task_force --Termer 18:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)