Revision as of 10:15, 23 December 2007 editItsmejudith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,743 edits extended to-do list← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:14, 27 December 2007 edit undoජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,484 edits As far as I know, except for SPAWAR, there are no post-2004 papers of note.Next edit → |
Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
#Reinclude the Taubes book (Bad Science) as an in-line reference |
|
#Reinclude the Taubes book (Bad Science) as an in-line reference |
|
#Consider splitting the Pons-Fleischman experiment to a sub-article |
|
#Consider splitting the Pons-Fleischman experiment to a sub-article |
|
#Set out the findings of the major post-2004 research papers| |
|
|
#Verify copyright status of external links to papers |
|
#Verify copyright status of external links to papers |
|
#Check accessibility to non-physicist readers |
|
#Check accessibility to non-physicist readers |