User talk:Zenwhat: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:05, 1 January 2008 editSarsaparilla (talk \| contribs)2,251 edits barnstar← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:00, 1 January 2008 edit undoSarsaparilla (talk \| contribs)2,251 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 61:		Line 61:
	==Interests==		==Interests==
	What are your interests? I have a few articles I've been wanting to get to Featured Article status. For instance, ], ], ], and ]. I also would like to see ] get to good article status. The latter would be worth a cookie or kitten if nothing else, and the others would be worth a barnstar I'm sure, or at least a userbox that says you've contributed to x number of featured articles. ] (]) 04:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)		What are your interests? I have a few articles I've been wanting to get to Featured Article status. For instance, ], ], ], and ]. I also would like to see ] get to good article status. The latter would be worth a cookie or kitten if nothing else, and the others would be worth a barnstar I'm sure, or at least a userbox that says you've contributed to x number of featured articles. ] (]) 04:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
			:Mainly politics and economics. Any articles you mentioned would be fine, although ] may have some POV issues (it looks good, ATM) and in ] the "support" and "oppose" sections are just silly. There's no need for political commentary in such an article. ] (]) 04:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
			::When we get to peer review and FAC, I'm sure any of those articles would get a lot of criticism. They are all in need of major rewriting/expansion to become featured. ] (]) 05:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:00, 1 January 2008

User:Zenwhat

User talk:Zenwhat

User:Zenwhat/Userboxes

User:Zenwhat/Awards

User:Zenwhat/To do list

User talk:Zenwhat/Archives

Special:Emailuser/Zenwhat

User talk:Zenwhat/References

User talk:Zenwhat/Hall of shame

User:Zenwhat/Sandbox

Main

Guidelines for my talk page:

Be civil at all times;
Fix any mistakes I make;
Give me at least 24 hours to a few days to respond. I edit Misplaced Pages sporadically.
Unless you have an openly stated policy on conversation, or request for me to reply here, I will reply on your page.
Please do not put substituted warnings on my talk page - I have edited Misplaced Pages for years, mostly as an unregistered user. Such warnings are condescending and will be removed.
Any messages should be in English, and as clear and as legible as possible. As long as I know what you're saying to me, it's okay.
If you have a request for me, please be aware that, unless dictated by policy or behavioural guideline, a member of the Arbitration Committee or Wikimedia Foundation (either paid employee or advisory board), or Jimbo Wales, I am not bound by your request, but will take it into consideration.
I reserve the right to remove any threads or revert any edits that I percieve to be in bad faith.

Violations of these guidelines may result in your post being removed or ignored.

Debt-based monetary system

Thanks for your note. I'm actually mostly offline for a few days, so my lack of activity is not an indication of anything more than busy-ness. Appreciate your efforts on this.--Gregalton (talk) 05:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

test 1

asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf

test 2

asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf

test 3

asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf

Your talk page

I tried to move the guidelines thing to no avail; I got it to budge to the right a bit, but then it disintegrated and spewed it's contents all over the page. I think there's some conflicting code or something that's causing a problem, but I can't figure out what... Master of Puppets 23:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Interests

What are your interests? I have a few articles I've been wanting to get to Featured Article status. For instance, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, free market environmentalism, instant-runoff voting, and private highway. I also would like to see workplace conflict get to good article status. The latter would be worth a cookie or kitten if nothing else, and the others would be worth a barnstar I'm sure, or at least a userbox that says you've contributed to x number of featured articles. Sarsaparilla (talk) 04:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Mainly politics and economics. Any articles you mentioned would be fine, although Free-market environmentalism may have some POV issues (it looks good, ATM) and in Private highway the "support" and "oppose" sections are just silly. There's no need for political commentary in such an article. Zenwhat (talk) 04:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

When we get to peer review and FAC, I'm sure any of those articles would get a lot of criticism. They are all in need of major rewriting/expansion to become featured. Sarsaparilla (talk) 05:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)