| Revision as of 22:09, 1 January 2008 editGailsllys (talk | contribs)81 edits →signal box Penmaenpool.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:23, 1 January 2008 edit undoGailsllys (talk | contribs)81 edits →signal box Penmaenpool.Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| == signal box Penmaenpool. == | == signal box Penmaenpool. == | ||
| I understand that having modernised it at great expense and had a "grand opening" with Lord Dafydd Elis |
I understand that having modernised it at great expense and had a "grand opening" with Lord Dafydd Elis-Thomas to do it, the RSPB decided they could not afford to keep it open. This was spring 2007. | ||
| The building is still there. (] (]) 22:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)) | The building is still there. (] (]) 22:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)) | ||
Revision as of 22:23, 1 January 2008
Reverting
Please provide some evidence that a separate railway line actually exists between Cardiff and Nottingham before reverting again. Consider this a {{uw-test1}}. Also please refrain from throwing around accusations (WP:AGF). 85.92.190.81 19:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- By the nature of your edits, you are quite clearly 90.203.45.244 and the warnings given there still apply. As far as your edits go, I am neutral on Cardiff Central to Nottingham Line, but arbitarily changing an article to a redirect is not the way to go about deleting it. Take it to WP:AFD instead. As for Stourbridge Town Branch Line, you have obviously either failed to read the discussions listed, or chosen to ignore them. Misplaced Pages works on consensus - if you do not agree with the consensus you will just have to put up with it. Further reversions without discussion will be taken as vandalism and dealt with accordingly. – Tivedshambo (talk) 19:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Redirection is not deletion, by any stretch of the imagination. Neither is it similar, equivalent, analogous, or any other word you care to use for the comparison. The Cardiff to Nottingham issue has already been debated at WT:RAIL, so take that up there. As for Stourbridge, there is nothing that could reasonably justify the inclusion of a single set of points in the route overview, and certainly no consensus anywhere supporting its inclusion. In fact, if you actually bothered to read such things as WP:NOT, you would realise that the consensus of the community actually opposes its inclusion. The appropriate venue for a discussion about including the most trivial details is on the WP:NOT talk page. I've also got no idea what you're on about with the other IP address. I'm certainly not responsible for those edits, so unless you have something a little more solid, or some rule which forbids anonymous users for looking at contributions histories, I'll warn you finally to stop the accusations of "hiding". I will continue to redirect inapropriate articles to more appropriate targets. 85.92.190.81 19:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
signal box Penmaenpool.
I understand that having modernised it at great expense and had a "grand opening" with Lord Dafydd Elis-Thomas to do it, the RSPB decided they could not afford to keep it open. This was spring 2007. The building is still there. (Gailsllys (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC))