Revision as of 09:16, 4 January 2008 editNat (talk | contribs)12,394 edits →January 2008: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Charles Darwin-Lincoln dispute#3RR is not an entitlement← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:17, 4 January 2008 edit undoNat (talk | contribs)12,394 edits →January 2008: mfixNext edit → | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
== January 2008 == | == January 2008 == | ||
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Gilad Shalit|a period of '''Gilad Shalit'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:true|] (]) 18:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Gilad Shalit|a period of '''Gilad Shalit'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:true|] (]) 18:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=My last edit was at , a warning was issued on my talk page at and I was blocked at . This is three and a half hours after my to Misplaced Pages that day. Both editors whom I reverted (] and ]) were active after the edits and accepted the revert, since they did not contest them. I did not consider myself to be in violation of ] since from the edit summaries in my short exchange with ] and in the discussion with him/her on my own ], it is rather obvious that this was a somewhat humorous exchange. While I do not contest making three reverts in less than 24 hours, I do contest the charge of edit-warring and due also to the timing of the block (4 hours after the last revert), it seems to me to be a punitive block, which is why I ask that if be lifted. I make this request not to continue edit warring (there is a nice compromise suggestion on ] to which I would like to agree), but to clear my name.|decline=] ] - ]] 09:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC) }} | {{unblock reviewed|1=My last edit was at , a warning was issued on my talk page at and I was blocked at . This is three and a half hours after my to Misplaced Pages that day. Both editors whom I reverted (] and ]) were active after the edits and accepted the revert, since they did not contest them. I did not consider myself to be in violation of ] since from the edit summaries in my short exchange with ] and in the discussion with him/her on my own ], it is rather obvious that this was a somewhat humorous exchange. While I do not contest making three reverts in less than 24 hours, I do contest the charge of edit-warring and due also to the timing of the block (4 hours after the last revert), it seems to me to be a punitive block, which is why I ask that if be lifted. I make this request not to continue edit warring (there is a nice compromise suggestion on ] to which I would like to agree), but to clear my name.|decline=] ] This request has been declined. - ]] 09:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC) }} | ||
:FYI for whoever reviews this, is the relevant report on ]. Feel free to take whatever action you feel is right (you don't need my permission if you want to modify the block - just do it.) --] (]) 07:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | :FYI for whoever reviews this, is the relevant report on ]. Feel free to take whatever action you feel is right (you don't need my permission if you want to modify the block - just do it.) --] (]) 07:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:17, 4 January 2008
WikiProject Palestine
WikiProject Palestine is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Palestine on Misplaced Pages. Start by adding your name to the list of members at WikiProject Palestine. Ahlan wa Sahlan! (Welcome!) |
Re: signature
Hi there! I use a template in my userspace to generate my signature. Normally, you're not allowed to use templates in signatures, but I use template substitution to get around it. What you have to do is create your own template in the vein of mine, and then use a raw signature of {{subst:User:Pedro Gonnet/sig}}
or whatever. You can format your timestamp using the variables outlined here. The only difference is, instead of signing with ~~~~
, you'll have to sign with ~~~
. The only other thing is that you should add yourself to Category:Users who have opted out of automatic signing, or SineBot will start duplicating your timestamp. If you need any other help, just post on my talk page. Cheers! east.718 at 18:55, 10/10/2007
Signature test
Testing, pedro gonnet - talk - 11.10.2007 07:55
CfD: Category:Israeli-Palestinian conflict issues
Hi. please help! The category Category:Israeli-Palestinian conflict issues has been nominated for deletion. this is a category which is meant to be simply a conveneient non-partisan gathering-place for all entries which are general overviews of various issues, as opposed to being related to a specific event or location. This category, I feel, is of immense benefit to all of us who habitually edit these articles, regardless of whether we may be more affiliated with Israeli concerns or Palestinian concerns. The category's deletion is being advocated by editors who rarely edit any articles on this topic, and have luittle involvement in this topic at Misplaced Pages.
Your help would be greatly appreciated. please go to this category's discussion entry, and express your opinion. Hopefully, you will be willing to advocate keeping this category. thanks. Please see Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 December 21#Category:Israeli-Palestinian conflict issues. Thanks, Sm8900 --207.10.186.39 (talk) 14:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Boo!
Shanghai is a much better term! *edit wars!* :P Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 10:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Tztztz -- still recovering from a new-year's binge? ;) pedro gonnet - talk - 03.01.2008 10:50
- It even has a pretty decent article. :P We should use it and wikilink it just cause it IS that cool. Naw, pre-new-years binge! Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 10:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, getting a head start on 2009 already? Cheers and happy 2008, pedro gonnet - talk - 03.01.2008 10:53
- It even has a pretty decent article. :P We should use it and wikilink it just cause it IS that cool. Naw, pre-new-years binge! Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 10:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
3RR violation
Please note that I have reported you at WP:3RR for edit warring on Gilad Shalit. I realize that you're not the only one participating in this disruption, but to this point you are the only one to clearly violate WP:3RR. This is especially inappropriate given your prior warning to other editors to avoid doing just this.
Given the lack of a warning prior to your reporting it may be that you are not punished for this policy violation, but please take into account the disruption you are causing to the article and realize that having to spend a few extra days on the talk page to gather support for your version of the article is not going to adversely affect the article in any substantial way. Daniel/T+ 17:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
You have been blocked from editing for a period of Gilad Shalit in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. B (talk) 18:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Pedrito (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My last edit was at 14:32, 3 January 2008, a warning was issued on my talk page at 17:33, 3 January 2008 and I was blocked at 18:47, 3 January 2008. This is three and a half hours after my last edit to Misplaced Pages that day. Both editors whom I reverted (User:Jaakobou and User:Kyaa the Catlord) were active after the edits and accepted the revert, since they did not contest them. I did not consider myself to be in violation of WP:3RR since from the edit summaries in my short exchange with User:Kyaa the Catlord and in the discussion with him/her on my own User talk:Pedro Gonnet#Boo!, it is rather obvious that this was a somewhat humorous exchange. While I do not contest making three reverts in less than 24 hours, I do contest the charge of edit-warring and due also to the timing of the block (4 hours after the last revert), it seems to me to be a punitive block, which is why I ask that if be lifted. I make this request not to continue edit warring (there is a nice compromise suggestion on Gilad Shalit to which I would like to agree), but to clear my name.
Decline reason:
The three revert rule is an electric fence, not an entitlement. This request has been declined. - nat.utoronto 09:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- FYI for whoever reviews this, this is the relevant report on WP:AN3. Feel free to take whatever action you feel is right (you don't need my permission if you want to modify the block - just do it.) --B (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)