Revision as of 19:00, 4 January 2008 editEusebeus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,667 edits →Danny Tanner: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:01, 4 January 2008 edit undoDoctorfluffy (talk | contribs)8,695 edits →Danny Tanner: deleteNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Merge''' into ] due to the lack of encyclopedic demonstration of notability (although it's possible to establish notability I guess, but this will take time). – ] <sup>]•c</sup> 16:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' into ] due to the lack of encyclopedic demonstration of notability (although it's possible to establish notability I guess, but this will take time). – ] <sup>]•c</sup> 16:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
**I agree with Alan's unintentional "commentary" above, whilst disagreeing with his !vote: his indolent google archive search, whilst perhaps providing "real world content", fails to provide the kind of real world content that can stand on its own without requiring qualifying quotation marks around it. Yes, google archive confirms that Bob Saget did indeed play Dan Tanner. Misplaced Pages notability policies, however, require slightly greater assertion of notability (<i>pace</i> Bob Saget). ] (]) 19:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | **I agree with Alan's unintentional "commentary" above, whilst disagreeing with his !vote: his indolent google archive search, whilst perhaps providing "real world content", fails to provide the kind of real world content that can stand on its own without requiring qualifying quotation marks around it. Yes, google archive confirms that Bob Saget did indeed play Dan Tanner. Misplaced Pages notability policies, however, require slightly greater assertion of notability (<i>pace</i> Bob Saget). ] (]) 19:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' per Eusebeus and Gavin Collins. ] (]) 19:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:01, 4 January 2008
Danny Tanner
This is a character that does not have real world information to establish notability. It has enough coverage within this revision of the character list, and there is no current assertion for improvement. I imagine that there may be a few points available, but those would be better placed on the list. TTN (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Did you do any research at all into this subject? After all you made the same assertion about Nights (video game character).YetanotherGenisock (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep, this is probably sourceable. Though most adults shun the show you cannot imagine its popularity among kids of tween age and younger (maybe finally waning). More pertinently Saget has made a career point of turning his back on the character. --Dhartung | Talk 00:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and add real-world context, of which there appears to be a fair amount in a brief perusal of Google News results. JavaTenor (talk) 04:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. Article tagged stub so its need of expansion is known to the project the article falls under. As the article includes references in pop culture, his notability is there, it just needs to be referenced. IrishLass (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marvellously uncontaminated by real world content or assertion of notability. Better covered at the character list. Eusebeus (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as fails WP:V and WP:NOT#PLOT. I agree with Eusebeus, there are no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate any real-world notability.--Gavin Collins (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Lead character in a notable series. This Google News Archive search shows 189 sources of "real world Content" that addresses the character. Once additional sources are added, I am willing to consider upgrading my vote. Alansohn (talk) 16:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Merge into List of Full House characters due to the lack of encyclopedic demonstration of notability (although it's possible to establish notability I guess, but this will take time). – sgeureka 16:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Alan's unintentional "commentary" above, whilst disagreeing with his !vote: his indolent google archive search, whilst perhaps providing "real world content", fails to provide the kind of real world content that can stand on its own without requiring qualifying quotation marks around it. Yes, google archive confirms that Bob Saget did indeed play Dan Tanner. Misplaced Pages notability policies, however, require slightly greater assertion of notability (pace Bob Saget). Eusebeus (talk) 19:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per Eusebeus and Gavin Collins. Doctorfluffy (talk) 19:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)