| Revision as of 23:41, 4 January 2008 editArglebargleIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,113 edits !vote = merge← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:50, 5 January 2008 edit undoDoctorfluffy (talk | contribs)8,695 edits →Norma Starkey: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Delete''' as this stub has insufficient content, context or reliable secondary sources to demonstrate the necessity of having a stand alone article.--] (]) 22:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as this stub has insufficient content, context or reliable secondary sources to demonstrate the necessity of having a stand alone article.--] (]) 22:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge'''. ]'s reasons are good, but the conclusion I draw is the same as ] -- the characters article can hold whatever information is needed about the characters. -- ] (]) 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Merge'''. ]'s reasons are good, but the conclusion I draw is the same as ] -- the characters article can hold whatever information is needed about the characters. -- ] (]) 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per Gavin Collins. ] (]) 17:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:50, 5 January 2008
Norma Starkey
- Norma Starkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:N and WP:FICT. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 23:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Paularblaster (talk) 00:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
comment merge to list of characters is most logical, please rename if kept to Norma Starkey (Shameless)Gnangarra 13:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC) see below
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY contribs 00:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Make a list of minor characters, and merge along with some of the other characters. No point in deleting this.--h i s r e s e a r c h 00:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Merge into Shameless TV article by creating a list of characters. Editors there can fight out which parts of this character summary are appropriate, but I don't believe this character warrants her own Wiki article.Tanthalas39 (talk) 03:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)- Delete the article Characters of Shameless already exists as such theres n need to merge Gnangarra 03:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. Changing my opinion to delete. Of course, this needs to be applied to the other dozen or so characters, each with their own Wiki page... Tanthalas39 (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Merge or Keep for now. I think a re-write of Characters of Shameless is needed. Majors go one place (each have own page as needed) and minors go into a single page. Lots of work for someone. Hobit (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as this stub has insufficient content, context or reliable secondary sources to demonstrate the necessity of having a stand alone article.--Gavin Collins (talk) 22:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Merge. Gavin Collins's reasons are good, but the conclusion I draw is the same as Hobit -- the characters article can hold whatever information is needed about the characters. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per Gavin Collins. Doctorfluffy (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)