Misplaced Pages

User:Phase4: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:23, 5 January 2008 view sourcePJHaseldine (talk | contribs)1,181 edits Reinsert Phase genesis and add Non-Admin tag← Previous edit Revision as of 12:31, 6 January 2008 view source PJHaseldine (talk | contribs)1,181 edits Phase genesis: expandingNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


==Phase genesis== ==Phase genesis==
The ] article describes the ] strategy of ] and of its development of nuclear weapons. Phase1, 2, 3 and 4 were sequential tactics of this SA over-arching strategy. Hence where we are now: Phase4! 21:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC) The ] article describes the ] strategy of ] and of its development of nuclear weapons. Phase1, 2, 3 and 4 were sequential tactics of this SA over-arching strategy. Hence where we are now: Phase4! 21:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

(This is an extract from ''The Misplaced Pages Review'' (http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=14896):

"QUOTE(jorge @ Sun 23rd December 2007, 1:03am)

'' '''User:Phase4''' has now been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of ] i.e. Patrick Haseldine. I wonder what all the Phase1, Phase 2, Phase4 stuff was about...?''

''It was pretty clear that those users were the same person, or at least related. They made little attempt to obfuscate the fact, and I haven't seen anything particularly disruptive or misleading in their edits.

''I also think the theory of South Africa's involvement in the bombing is more compelling than that of Libya's.

''I'm now very curious about the motivations and identity of ] and his tag team partner ]. Their edits show an interest in South Africa military history and weapons."'')
{{AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD}} {{AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD}}

Revision as of 12:31, 6 January 2008

This user is not an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify)

Template:Sockpuppetproven

Introduction

This is the Phase4 user page. From February 17, 2006 action on user and talk pages for Phase1 and Phase2 was transferred to the relevant Phase4 page. Phase3 was skipped.Phase4 21:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Phase genesis

The South Africa and weapons of mass destruction#Nuclear_strategy article describes the finite deterrence strategy of apartheid South Africa and of its development of nuclear weapons. Phase1, 2, 3 and 4 were sequential tactics of this SA over-arching strategy. Hence where we are now: Phase4! 21:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

(This is an extract from The Misplaced Pages Review (http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=14896):

"QUOTE(jorge @ Sun 23rd December 2007, 1:03am)

User:Phase4 has now been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of PJHaseldine i.e. Patrick Haseldine. I wonder what all the Phase1, Phase 2, Phase4 stuff was about...?

It was pretty clear that those users were the same person, or at least related. They made little attempt to obfuscate the fact, and I haven't seen anything particularly disruptive or misleading in their edits.

I also think the theory of South Africa's involvement in the bombing is more compelling than that of Libya's.

I'm now very curious about the motivations and identity of Socrates2008 and his tag team partner Deon Steyn. Their edits show an interest in South Africa military history and weapons.")


This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Misplaced Pages.

User:Phase4: Difference between revisions Add topic